<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">managementscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управленческие науки / Management Sciences</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Management Sciences</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2304-022X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2618-9941</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26794/2304-022X-2017-7-3-100-105</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">managementscience-120</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫЙ ОПЫТ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Индексы международной конкурентоспособности и структурные реформы Японии</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The International Competitiveness Indexes and the Structural Reforms in Japan*</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Морева</surname><given-names>ЕВГЕНИЯ ЛЬВОВНА</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Moreva</surname><given-names>E. L.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат экономических наук, заместитель директора Института промышленной политики и институционального развития</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD (Econ.), Deputy Director of the Institute of Industrial Policy and Institutional Development</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">ELMoreva@fa.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Институт промышленной политики и институционального развития, Финансовый университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Institute of Industrial Policy and Institutional Development, Financial University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2017</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>09</month><year>2017</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>100</fpage><lpage>105</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Морева Е.Л., 2017</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2017</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Морева Е.Л.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Moreva E.L.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/120">https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/120</self-uri><abstract><p>Целью настоящей статьи является определение направлений оптимизации отечественных усилий по преодолению структурных проблем страны по переходу к хозяйственным порядкам, соответствующим «Индустрии 4.0», используя для этого анализ опыта Японии, накопленный за последние десятилетия, и информации индексов международной конкурентоспособности. Актуальность данной темы связана с универсальным характером таких структурных проблем, а потому возможностью для России обратиться для их решения к опыту аналогичных попыток мировых лидеров, таких как Япония, а также определить целесообразность использовать для этого индексы международной конкурентоспособности. Соответственно, были исследованы основные индексы международной конкурентоспособности и динамика их значений для Японии, сопоставленная с национальной политикой по преодолению структурных проблем. В результате был сделан вывод, что и эти проблемы, и политика по их преодолению слабо отражались в указанных индексах в течение последних лет, показывающих благоприятное положение национальной экономики. Они не учитывали скрытых структурных противоречий и их развитие, что в конечном счете было чревато для конкурентоспособности страны. В этих условиях государство вынуждено было искать пути формирования новой экономический структуры, игнорируя индексный инструментарий. Такое заключение было важно для решения аналогичных проблем в России. Незавершенный характер поисков Японии по преодолению структурных проблем заставлял учитывать трудности осуществления такой политики, чтобы не повторять ее ошибок. Положительные же оценки экономического положения страны в индексах международной конкурентоспособности говорили о необходимости осторожно относиться к ним, так как они не отражали риски консервации прежней структуры производства с последующей утратой лидерства.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The Purpose of the article is to determine the directions of the optimization of national efforts to overcome the structural problems of Russia to transit to the Industry 4.0 economic order taking into consideration the Japanese experience accumulated in the last decades and the information of indexes international competitiveness. The relevance of the theme is due to the universal character of such a structural problem and thus to the opportunities for Russia to apply to the attempts of Japan to resolve them being the country one of world leaders as well as to make use of the international competitiveness indexes for the same purpose. These were analyzed with the respective dynamics of their values for Japan compared with the national policy to overcome the structural problems. It proved these problems and the policy to overcome them to be poorly reflected by the indexes pretending the latter to show a positive situation of the national economy of the last decades. The indexes did not reflect the hidden contradictions of the economic structure fraught finally for the national competitiveness. Under such circumstances, the State was to seek the ways to form a new economic structure ignoring the index instruments. This conclusion resulted valuable to resolve the similar problems in Russia. The unfinished search of Japan for a structural problem solutions made one to consider the difficulties to implement such a policy not to repeat its mistakes. Meanwhile the positive evaluation of the economic situation in Japan presented by the international competitiveness indexes proved it necessary to treat them cautiously since these didn’t reflect the risks to conserve the elder production structure with the consequent loss of leadership.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>индексы международной конкурентоспособности</kwd><kwd>индекс глобальной конкурентоспособности Всемирного экономического форума</kwd><kwd>индекс конкурентоспособности ЮНИДО</kwd><kwd>индекс конкурентоспособности обрабатывающей промышленности DeloitteToucheTohmatsu</kwd><kwd>индекс конкурентоспособности по издержкам в обрабатывающей промышленности BostonConsultingGroup</kwd><kwd>абэномика</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>the Global Competitiveness Index of World Economic Forum</kwd><kwd>the Competitive Industrial Performance Index of UNIDO</kwd><kwd>The Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index</kwd><kwd>BCG Global Manufacturing Cost-Competitiveness Index</kwd><kwd>Abenomics</kwd><kwd>the Global Competitiveness Index of World Economic Forum</kwd><kwd>the Competitive Industrial Performance Index of UNIDO</kwd><kwd>The Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index</kwd><kwd>BCG Global Manufacturing Cost-Competitiveness Index</kwd><kwd>Abenomics</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">IMD Releases its 2015 World Competitiveness Rankings. URL: http://www.icegec.hu/download/publications/ imd_icegec_pr 2015_eng.pdf (accessed: 29.07.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">IMD Releases its 2015 World Competitiveness Rankings. URL: http://www.icegec.hu/download/publications/ imd_icegec_pr 2015_eng.pdf (accessed: 29.07.2017).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017. Geneva, World Economic Forum, 2016, 385 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Global Competitiveness Report 2016–2017. Geneva, World Economic Forum, 2016, 385 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The Industrial Competitiveness of Nations. Looking back, forging ahead. Competitive Industrial Performance Report 2012/2013. Vienna, United Nations Industrial development organization, 2013, 149 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The Industrial Competitiveness of Nations. Looking back, forging ahead. Competitive Industrial Performance Report 2012/2013. Vienna, United Nations Industrial development organization, 2013, 149 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">2010 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index. USA, The Global Manufacturing Industry group, 56 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">2010 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index. USA, The Global Manufacturing Industry group, 56 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The 2016 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index (GMCI) report. USA, The Deloitte Center for Industry Insights, 2016, 89 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The 2016 Global Manufacturing Competitiveness Index (GMCI) report. USA, The Deloitte Center for Industry Insights, 2016, 89 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2014. Switzerland, IMD World Competitiveness Center, 2014, 485 р.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2014. Switzerland, IMD World Competitiveness Center, 2014, 485 р.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Corwin J., Puckett P. Japan’s Manufacturing Competitiveness Strategy: Challenges for Japan, Opportunities for the United States. USA, International Trade Administration, 2009, 34 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Corwin J., Puckett P. Japan’s Manufacturing Competitiveness Strategy: Challenges for Japan, Opportunities for the United States. USA, International Trade Administration, 2009, 34 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garelli S., Rosselet-McCauley S. How Much Longer Will the U.S. Remain the Leader in World Competitiveness? Towards a re-make of the Japanese tragedy? IMD’s World Competitiveness Center. Switzerland, IMD, 2008, 5 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garelli S., Rosselet-McCauley S. How Much Longer Will the U.S. Remain the Leader in World Competitiveness? Towards a re-make of the Japanese tragedy? IMD’s World Competitiveness Center. Switzerland, IMD, 2008, 5 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Noland M. Industrial Policy, Innovation Policy and Japanese Competitiveness. WP 07–4, May 2007. USA, The Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2007. 10. The Industrial Structure Vision 2010. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, June, 2010. URL: http://www. meti.go.jp/english/policy/economy/industrial.html (accessed: 29.07.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Noland M. Industrial Policy, Innovation Policy and Japanese Competitiveness. WP 07–4, May 2007. USA, The Peterson Institute for International Economics, 2007. 10. The Industrial Structure Vision 2010. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, June, 2010. URL: http://www. meti.go.jp/english/policy/economy/industrial.html (accessed: 29.07.2017).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Reform Agenda for 2017: Overview and Country Notes, Japan in: Economic Policy Reforms 2017: Going for Growth. France, OECD, 2017, pp. 233–236.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Reform Agenda for 2017: Overview and Country Notes, Japan in: Economic Policy Reforms 2017: Going for Growth. France, OECD, 2017, pp. 233–236.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sawa T. Why Abenomics is failing. Shiga University, 2016. URL: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/ opinion/2016/03/13/commentary/japan-commentary/why-abenomics-is-failing/#.WYS7zlGx-M8 (accessed: 29.07.2017).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sawa T. Why Abenomics is failing. Shiga University, 2016. URL: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/ opinion/2016/03/13/commentary/japan-commentary/why-abenomics-is-failing/#.WYS7zlGx-M8 (accessed: 29.07.2017).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2017. Switzerland, IMD World Competitiveness Center, 2017, 180 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking 2017. Switzerland, IMD World Competitiveness Center, 2017, 180 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
