managementscienceУправленческие науки / Management SciencesManagement Sciences2304-022X2618-9941Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation10.26794/2304-022X-2018-8-4-25-39managementscience-174Research ArticleГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ И МУНИЦИПАЛЬНОЕ УПРАВЛЕНИЕSTATE AND MUNICIPAL MANAGEMENTАнализ согласованности показателей государственных программ (обеспечение граждан жильем и развитие физической культуры и спорта), установленных на федеральном и региональном уровняхIndicator Conformity Analysis of State Programs (Housing and Sports Development) at Federal and Regional Levelshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6983-2214ГерасимоваЮ. В.GerasimovaYu. V.

Юлия Вячеславовна Герасимова — cтарший научный сотрудник Лаборатории исследования бюджетной политики Института прикладных экономических исследований

 

Yulia V. Gerasimova — Senior Researcher of Laboratory of Budget Policy of Institute of Applied Economic Research 

Moscow

GerasimovaYuVi@yandex.ruРоссийская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФРоссияRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public AdministrationRussian Federation201823012019842539Copyright © Герасимова Ю.В., 20192019Герасимова Ю.В.Gerasimova Y.V.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/174

В статье проводится оценка согласованности стратегических документов федерального и регионального уровней по двум предметам совместного ведения Российской Федерации и субъектов Российской Федерации:

The article verifies the consistency between strategic documents at the federal and the regional levels on the two subjects of joint jurisdiction of theRussian Federationand the constituent entities of theRussian Federation: providing citizens with housing and development of sports. The federal law on strategic planning provides for the coordination of target values of indicators of strategic documents on joint management. Provisions on the need for such coordination in 2016–2017 appeared in the bylaws on the formation of state programs and strategies for socio-economic development. However, according to the research, the target values of the main indicators of these sectors of the economy as of the beginning of2018 inthe policy documents stated to be not coordinated — their values, established in federal state programs, are 10–20% higher than the aggregate values declared by the subjects of the russian federation in regional state programs. The study was conducted on the basis of a comparison of the data of strategic documents of the federal and regional levels. The main attention is paid to studying the coherence of state programs as the most relevant strategic documents related to the budget process. The author analyzes the sets of target indicators used by federal and regional government programs to establish medium-term goals. In the course of the research several indicators were identified for each direction, for which a more detailed analysis of the sequence of federal and aggregated regional values was carried out. In the direction of housing analysis the number of housing in 2020 was investigated, and in the direction of development of physical culture and sports the following indicators were review: the proportion of the population systematically engaged in physical culture and sports in 2020; share of the population provided with sports facilities on the basis of one-time visitor capacity in 2020. Statistical methods were used in the study. The author comes to the conclusion that in order to ensure the consistency of the indicators of strategic documents, it is necessary to select the key indicators for each subject of joint management, and to develop principles for their coordination as well as to create a mechanism for harmonizing indicators.

стратегическое планированиестратегии социально-экономического развитиягосударственные программысогласование целей по полномочиям совместного ведения Российской Федерации и субъектов Российской Федерацииразвитие физической культуры и спортаобеспечение населения жильемввод жильядоля населениясистематически занимающегося физкультурой и спортомуровень обеспеченности населения спортивными сооружениями исходя из единовременной пропускной способности объектов спортаstrategic planningstrategy of socio-economic developmentstate and regional programscoordination of the goals for the powers of joint management of federal and regional leveldevelopment of sportshousinghousing constructionpopulation proportion engaged in sportsthe availability of sports facilities on the basis of one-time visitor capacityReferencesЗубаревич Н.В. Региональное развитие и региональная политика за десятилетие экономического роста. Журнал новой экономической ассоциации. 2009;(1–2):161–174.Zubarevich N.V. Regional development and regional policy over a decade of economic growth. Zhurnal novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2009;(1–2):161–174. (In Russ.).Кузнецова О.В. Региональная политика России: 20 лет реформ и новые возможности. М.: Ленанд; 2017. 392 с.Kuznetsova O.V. Russia’s regional policy: 20 years of reforms and new opportunities. Mоscow: Lenand; 2017. 392 p. (In Russ.).Кузнецов А. В., Кузнецова О. В. Региональная политика: зарубежный опыт и российские реалии. М.: ИМЭМО РАН; 2015. 137 с.Kuznetsov A.V., Kuznetsova O.V. Regional policy: Foreign experience and Russian realities. Mоscow: IMEMO RAS; 2015. 137 p. (In Russ.).Де Брюйн Х. Управление по результатам в государственном секторе. Пер. с англ. М.: Изд-во Института комплексных стратегических исследований; 2005. 192 с.De Bruijn H. Managing performance in the public sector. Transl. from Eng. Moscow: Institute for Complex Strategic Studies Publ.; 2005. 192 p.Клименко А. Десятилетие административной реформы: результаты и новые вызовы. Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления. 2014;(1):8–51.Klimenko A. A decade of administrative reform: Results and new challenges. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues. 2014;(1):8–51. (In Russ.).Lewis J.M. The politics and consequences of performance measurement. Policy and Society. 2015;34(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.001Lewis J.M. The politics and consequences of performance measurement. Policy and Society. 2015;34(1):1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.001Клименко А.В., Королев В.А., Двинских Д.Ю., Сластихина И.Ю. О гармонизации документов государственного стратегического планирования. М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики; 2015. 48 c.Klimenko A.V., Korolev V.A., Dvinskikh D. Yu., Slastikhina I. Yu. On the harmonization of documents of the state strategic planning. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ. House; 2015. 48 p. (In Russ.).Ланцев Д. Согласование стратегического и бюджетного планирования на муниципальном уровне. Бюджет. 2015;(6):15–20.Lantsev D. Coordination of strategic and budget planning at the municipal level. Byudzhet. 2015;(6):15–20. (In Russ.).Пузанов А., Попов Р., Ланцев Д. Методические рекомендации по оптимизации стратегического планирования на муниципальном уровне. М.: Фонд «Институт экономики города»; 2015:32.Puzanov A., Popov R., Lantsev D. Methodological recommendations for the optimization of strategic planning at the municipal level. Moscow: Fund “Institute of Urban Economics”; 2015. 32 p. (In Russ.).Петров С.Ю. Показатели оценки государственных программ развития физической культуры и спорта в регионе (на примере Псковской области). Актуальные вопросы экономики и современного менеджмента. Сб. науч. тр. по итогам III междунар. науч.-практ. конф. (Самара, 11 апреля 2016 г.). Н. Новгород: Инновационный центр развития образования и науки; 2016:66–68.Petrov S. Yu. Indicators of evaluation of state programs for the development of physical culture and sports in the region (the example of the Pskov region). In: Topical issues of economics and modern management. Proc. 3rd Int. sci.-pract. conf. (Samara, 11 Apr. 2016). Nizhny Novgorod: Innovation Center for the Development of Education and Science; 2016:66–68. (In Russ.).Божья-Воля А.А., Мясникова Е. Ю. Преодоление «парадоксов результативности» при реализации государственных программ Пермского края. Ars Administrandi. Искусство управления. 2016;(1):99–112. DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2016-1-99-112Bozh’ya-Volya A.A., Myasnikova E. Yu. Overcoming “paradoxes of efficiency” in the implementation of state programs of the Perm region. Ars Administrandi. Iskusstvo upravleniya = Ars Administrandi. The Art of Management. 2016;(1):99–112. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/2218-9173-2016-1-99-112Лавров А. М., Бегчин Н.А. Проблемы и перспективы внедрения «программных» бюджетов. Финансы. 2016;(4):3–12.Lavrov A. M., Begchin N. A. Problems and prospects of implementation of “program” budgets. Finansy = Finance. 2016;(4):3–12. (In Russ.).Christensen C. M., Donovan T. The process of strategy development and implementation. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 2000;(00–075). URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c0a4/13dc3f438d21f62904936819fa34df6331b4.pdf.Christensen C. M., Donovan T. The process of strategy development and implementation. Harvard Business School Working Paper, 2000;(00–075). URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c0a4/13dc3f438d21f62904936819fa34df6331b4.pdfPettigrew A. M. The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal. 1992;13(S 2):5–16. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250130903Pettigrew A. M. The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal. 1992;13(S 2):5–16. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250130903

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.