managementscienceУправленческие науки / Management SciencesManagement Sciences2304-022X2618-9941Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation10.26794/2404-022X-2020-10-2-6-21managementscience-260Research ArticleТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА УПРАВЛЕНИЯTHEORY AND PRACTICE OF MANAGEMENTСовершенствование управления эффективностью налоговой службыImprovement of Tax Service Efficiency Managementhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9099-9847БорщевскийГ. А.BorshchevskiiG. A.

Георгий Александрович Борщевский — доктор политических наук, доцент

Москва

Georgii A. Borshchevskii — Dr. Sci. (Pol.), Associate Professor

Moscow

ga.borshchevskiy@igsu.ruРоссийская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации (РАНХиГС)РоссияRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)Russian Federation202013072020102621Copyright © Борщевский Г.А., 20202020Борщевский Г.А.Borshchevskii G.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/260

Статья посвящена оценке эффективности налоговой службы России на фоне процессов развития налоговой системы в 1991–2018 гг. Использованы методы: количественные (факторный анализ, эконометрические и экономико-статистические методы, контент-анализ нормативных правовых актов, табличные и графические методы визуализации, мониторинг показателей деятельности налоговых органов) и качественные (сравнительно-правовой и сравнительно-исторический анализ). Предложена методика оценки развития налоговой службы; методика протестирована на статистических данных, рассчитаны соответствующие индексы; составлена хронология ключевых событий развития налоговой системы и налоговой службы в РФ. Выявлено статистическое соответствие индексов развития налоговой службы и налоговой системы; рассогласование динамики индексов в 2014–2018 гг. вызвано посткризисным замедлением экономического роста и негативными тенденциями в государственном регулировании. Выявленные закономерности можно использовать для оценки эффективности и реформирования службы в налоговых органах.

Purpose of the paper is to assess the effectiveness of the Russian tax system in comparison with the development of public service in tax authorities. We use both quantitative methods (e.g. factor analysis, principal component analysis, economic and statistical methods, econometrics, content analysis of legal acts, tabular and graphical visualization, monitoring of tax authorities’ performance indicators) and qualitative methods (comparative legal and comparative historical analysis). The main research results: we proposed a comprehensive methodology for assessing the development of the tax system and service of the Russian Federation in 1991–2018; we have tested this methodology on statistical data and calculated the indices; compiled a chronology of key events in the tax system and tax authorities development of the Russian Federation. We conclude the high degree of statistical compliance of the tax system development indices and the tax service indices. Mismatch in the dynamics of the development of the tax system and tax service in the recent period of 2014–2018 caused by both the post-crisis slowdown in economic growth and negative trends in government regulation (the emergence of new taxes, increased tax burden on businesses etc.). Identified patterns can be used to assess the effectiveness and reform of service in the tax authorities.

государственная службаналоговая службаналоговые органыналоговая системареформированиеэффективностьpublic servicetax servicetax authoritiestax systemreformefficiencyReferencesХафизова А.Р. Показатели оценки эффективности деятельности налоговых органов: обзор существующих подходов. Финансы и кредит. 2012;(31):18–24.Hafizova A.R. Performance indicators for tax authorities: A review of existing approaches. Finansy i kredit = Finance and Credit. 2012;(31):18–24. (In Russ.).Steshenko J.A., Tikhonova A.V. An integral approach to evaluating the effectiveness of tax incentives. Journal of Tax Reform. 2018;4(2):157–173. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.2.050Steshenko J.A., Tikhonova A.V. An integral approach to evaluating the effectiveness of tax incentives. Journal of Tax Reform. 2018;4(2):157–173. DOI: 10.15826/jtr.2018.4.2.050Мороз В.В., Мороз С.В. Показатели эффективности работы налоговых органов. Проблемы экономики и юридической практики. 2018;(2):50–52.Moroz V.V., Moroz S.V. Performance indicators of tax authorities. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoy praktiki = Economic Problems and Legal Practice. 2018;(2):50–52. (In Russ.).Chaikovskaya N.V., Chaikovsky D.V., Terentieva I.V. Methodology of assessment of the control work efficiency of the tax authority. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015;6(6):127–135.Chaikovskaya N.V., Chaikovsky D.V., Terentieva I.V. Methodology of assessment of the control work efficiency of the tax authority. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015;6(6):127–135.Васильев С.В. Налогообложение в России в период перехода к рыночной экономике и налоги как инструмент государственного регулирования экономики в конце XX и начале XXI столетий. Экономика и бизнес: теория и практика. 2018;(10–1):32–41. DOI: 10.24411/2411–0450–2018–10054Vasil’ev S.V. Taxation in Russia during the transition to a market economy and taxes as an instrument of state regulation of the economy in the late XX and early XXI centuries. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika = Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. 2018;(10–1):32–41. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2411–0450–2018–10054Shibaeva N.A., Zarudneva A.I., Sozinova A.A., Shuvaev A.V., Alekseev A.N. Restructuring of tax liabilities as an upcoming trend of economic diversification in modern Russia. In: Gashenko I., Zima Y., Davidyan A., eds. Optimization of the taxation system: Preconditions, tendencies and perspectives. Cham: Springer-Verlag; 2019:83–89. (Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Vol. 182). DOI: 10.1007/978–3–030–01514–5_10Shibaeva N.A., Zarudneva A.I., Sozinova A.A., Shuvaev A.V., Alekseev A.N. Restructuring of tax liabilities as an upcoming trend of economic diversification in modern Russia. In: Gashenko I., Zima Y., Davidyan A., eds. Optimization of the taxation system: Preconditions, tendencies and perspectives. Cham: Springer-Verlag; 2019:83–89. (Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Vol. 182). DOI: 10.1007/978–3–030–01514–5_10Dmitriev O.N., Novikov S.V. Transformation of Russian tax system as part of the integration of the economy into international high-technology production field of socio-economic systems. European Research Studies Journal. 2018;21(4):400–413.Dmitriev O.N., Novikov S.V. Transformation of Russian tax system as part of the integration of the economy into international high-technology production field of socio-economic systems. European Research Studies Journal. 2018;21(4):400–413.Cagala T., Rincke J., Cueva A.T. Administrative efficiency and tax compliance. In: Proc. 110th Annual conf. on taxation (Philadelphia, PA, 9–11 Nov., 2017). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc.; 2018:2648–2677. URL: https://ntanet.org/wp-content/uploads/proceedings/2017/NTA2017–263.pdf (дата обращения: 12.01.2020).Cagala T., Rincke J., Cueva A.T. Administrative efficiency and tax compliance. In: Proc. 110th Annual conf. on taxation (Philadelphia, PA, 9–11 Nov., 2017). Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates, Inc.; 2018:2648–2677. URL: https://ntanet.org/wp-content/uploads/proceedings/2017/NTA2017–263.pdf (accessed on 12.01.2020).Aguzarova L.A., Aguzarova F.S. Planning of tax payments as a factor of economic growth. European Research Studies. 2018;21(2):195–206.Aguzarova L.A., Aguzarova F.S. Planning of tax payments as a factor of economic growth. European Research Studies. 2018;21(2):195–206.Friedman J., Betor T., Do S. The votes are in: State responses to Federal tax reform. Tax Executive. 2018;70:31– 43. URL: https://taxexecutive.org/the-votes-are-in-state-responses-to-federal-tax-reform (дата обращения: 12.01.2020).Friedman J., Betor T., Do S. The votes are in: State responses to Federal tax reform. Tax Executive. 2018;70:31– 43. URL: https://taxexecutive.org/the-votes-are-in-state-responses-to-federal-tax-reform (accessed on 12.01.2020).Мишустин М.В. Факторы роста налоговых поступлений: Макроэкономический подход. Экономическая политика. 2016;11(5):8–27.Mishustin M.V. Tax revenue growth factors: A macroeconomic approach. Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy. 2016;11(5):8–27. (In Russ.).Grote M. How to establish a tax policy unit. IMF How-To Note. 2017;(02). URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Fiscal-Affairs-Department-How-To-Notes/Issues/2017/10/19/How-to-Establish-a-Tax-PolicyUnit-45322 (дата обращения: 12.01.2020).Grote M. How to establish a tax policy unit. IMF How-To Note. 2017;(02). URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Fiscal-Affairs-Department-How-To-Notes/Issues/2017/10/19/How-to-Establish-a-Tax-PolicyUnit-45322 (accessed on 12.01.2020).Slemrod J. Is this tax reform, or just confusion? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2018;32(4):73–96. DOI: 10.1257/jep.32.4.73Slemrod J. Is this tax reform, or just confusion? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2018;32(4):73–96. DOI: 10.1257/jep.32.4.73Andrle M., Hebous Sh., Kangur A., Raissi M. Italy: Toward a growth-friendly fiscal reform. IMF Working Paper. 2018;(59). URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/03/16/Italy-Toward-a-GrowthFriendly-Fiscal-Reform-45737#:~:text=Summary%3A,are%20yet%20to%20be%20specified (дата обращения: 12.01.2020).Andrle M., Hebous Sh., Kangur A., Raissi M. Italy: Toward a growth-friendly fiscal reform. IMF Working Paper. 2018;(59). URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/03/16/Italy-Toward-a-Growth-FriendlyFiscal-Reform-45737#:~:text=Summary%3A,are%20yet%20to%20be%20specified (accessed on 12.01.2020).Fack G., Landais C. The effect of tax enforcement on tax elasticities: Evidence from charitable contributions in France. Journal of Public Economics. 2016;133:23–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.10.004Fack G., Landais C. The effect of tax enforcement on tax elasticities: Evidence from charitable contributions in France. Journal of Public Economics. 2016;133:23–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.10.004Xiong Z., Li H. Ecological deficit tax: A tax design and simulation of compensation for ecosystem service value based on ecological footprint in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;230:1128–1137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.172Xiong Z., Li H. Ecological deficit tax: A tax design and simulation of compensation for ecosystem service value based on ecological footprint in China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;230:1128–1137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.172Борщевский Г.А., Красильникова О.М. Совершенствование организации прохождения государственной службы в налоговых органах РФ. Ивлева Г.Ю., ред. Государственное управление и развитие России: вызовы и возможности. Т. 3. М.: Научная библиотека; 2018:361–365.Borshevsky G.A., Krasilnikova O.M. Improving the organization of civil service in the tax authorities of the Russian Federation. In: Ivleva G. Yu., ed. Public administration and development of Russia: Challenges and opportunities. Vol. 3. Moscow: Nauchnaya biblioteka; 2018:361–365. (In Russ.).

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.