<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">managementscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управленческие науки / Management Sciences</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Management Sciences</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2304-022X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2618-9941</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26794/2404-022X-2021-11-1-20-34</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">managementscience-297</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА УПРАВЛЕНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MANAGEMENT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Управление прорывной экономикой</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>A Breakthrough Economy Management</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2550-0250</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мацкуляк</surname><given-names>И.  Д.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Matskuluyak</surname><given-names>I. D.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Иван Дмитриевич Мацкуляк — доктор экономических наук, профессор, заслуженный деятель науки РФ, профессор кафедры экономической политики и экономических измерений </p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Ivan D. Matskuluyak — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Professor of the Department of Economic Policy and Economic Measurements </p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">mid48@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-4727</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мацкуляк</surname><given-names>Д. И.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Matskulyak</surname><given-names>D. I.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Дмитрий Иванович Мацкуляк — кандидат экономических наук, генеральный директор </p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Dmitrii I. Matskulyak — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), CEO </p><p>Моscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">midio@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Государственный университет управления</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>State University of Management</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ООО «Юкон Лайн»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>LLC “Yukon Line”</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>04</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>20</fpage><lpage>34</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Мацкуляк И.Д., Мацкуляк Д.И., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Мацкуляк И.Д., Мацкуляк Д.И.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Matskuluyak I.D., Matskulyak D.I.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/297">https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/297</self-uri><abstract><p>Предметом исследования выступает совокупность отношений между субъектами предпринимательства по поводу управления прорывной экономикой в отечественных условиях. Цель исследования — изучение управления, возникающего на основе внедрения инноваций, их комбинаций, воплощающих в производственный процесс видения предпринимателей; привлечение внимания управленческих кадров — органов государственной власти и хозяйствования, законодателей, ученых и работодателей к данной проблеме. Сформулирован ряд задач: раскрыть содержание «прорывного управления»; представить его эволюцию и компоненты; сформулировать экономические закономерности осуществления; обосновать ряд направлений совершенствования, включающих ядро основных составляющих алгоритма и финансовое обеспечение прорывного управления. Методологической базой разработки являются ключевые положения стратегического предпринимательского менеджмента и классической и австрийской школ. Методы исследования — анализ развития единичного и общего разделения управленческого труда, части и целого в экономике; сбор, обработка и группировка фактов, их анализ и синтез; единство логического и исторического. Обоснован вывод о том, что процесс управления внутри фирмы находит свое продолжение вне ее, т.е. во внешнем рыночном проявлении. Он становится базовым инструментом экономического развития хозяйствующих субъектов, превращается в специфический рациональный канал привнесения комбинированной модернизации экономики. Его уникальность обусловлена органическим взаимодействием самостоятельного и обособленного внутрифирменного производства, с одной стороны, и функционирования рыночной экономики как системы — с другой. Процесс его осуществления становится движущей силой экономического прогресса. Поиск путей решения возникающих при этом проблем является ключевой функцией прорывного предпринимательского управления.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The research focuses on the set of relations between business entities in regards to the management of a breakthrough economy in domestic conditions. The goal of the research is to study the management that arises from the introduction of innovations and their combinations, as well as representing the entrepreneurs vision in the production process; drawing the attention of managerial personnel to this problem — state and economic authorities, legislators, scientists and employers. There have been formulated a number of tasks: to disclose the content of breakthrough management; to present its evolution and components; to formulate economic patterns of the implementation; to justify a number of improvement areas, including the core of the main components of the algorithm and the breakthrough management financial support. The methodological basis for the development is the key provisions of strategic entrepreneurial management and the theory of classical and Austrian schools. The research methods are analysis of the development of a single and general division of managerial labor, a part and a whole in the economy; collection, processing and grouping of facts, their analysis and synthesis; the unity of the logical and historical. The conclusion is justified that the company internal management process finds its continuation outside of it, i.e. in external market development. It becomes the basic tool for the economic development of economic entities, turns into a specific rational channel for introducing combined modernization of the economy. Its uniqueness is due to the organic interaction of independent and own intracompany production, on the one hand, and the functioning of the market economy as a system, on the other one. Such implementation process becomes a driving force for an economic leap. The looking for a solution of arising problems in this case approach is a key function of breakthrough entrepreneurial management.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>управление</kwd><kwd>прорывное управление</kwd><kwd>прорывная экономика</kwd><kwd>экономический рывок</kwd><kwd>предпринимательство</kwd><kwd>фирма</kwd><kwd>рынок</kwd><kwd>рыночная система</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>management</kwd><kwd>breakthrough management</kwd><kwd>a breakthrough economy</kwd><kwd>economic leap</kwd><kwd>business</kwd><kwd>company</kwd><kwd>market</kwd><kwd>market system</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мацкуляк И.Д., Сапожникова Н.Т., Харчилава Г. П. Прорывная экономика: к теории управления изменениями экономических систем. Управленец. 2019;10(4):75–84. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2019–10–4–7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matskuluyak I. D., Sapozhnikova N. T., Kharchilava G. P. A breakthrough economy: On the theory of economic systems change management. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2019;10(4):75–84. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2019–10–4–7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мацкуляк Д.И., Мацкуляк И.Д. Перемена политико-экономических отношений и безопасность. М.: Изд. дом ГУУ; 2016. 335 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matskulyak D.I., Matskulyak I.D. Change in political and economic relations and security. Moscow: The State University of Management Publ.; 2016. 335 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коуз Р. Очерки об экономической науке и экономистах. Пер. с англ. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара; Международные отношения; СПб.: Факультет свободных искусств и наук СПбГУ; 2015. 288 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coase R. H. Essays on economics and economists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2012. 236 p. (Russ. ed.: Coase R. Ocherki ob ekonomicheskoi nauke i ekonomistakh. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ.; Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya; St. Petersburg: Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences of St. Petersburg State University; 2015. 288 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гальперин В.М. Теория фирмы. СПб.: Экономическая школа; 1995. 534 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gal’perin V.M. Theory of the firm. St. Petersburg: Economic School; 1995. 534 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ротбард М. Власть и рынок: государство и экономика. Пер. с англ. Челябинск: Социум; 2010. 418 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rothbard M.N. Power &amp; market: Government and the economy. Riverside, NJ: Andrews McMeel Publ.; 1977. 331 p. (Russ. ed.: Rothbard M. Vlast’ i rynok: gosudarstvo i ekonomika. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium; 2010. 416 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bylund P.L. The division of labor and the firm: An Austrian attempt at explaining the firm in the market. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2011;14(2):188–215. URL: https://cdn.mises.org/qjae14_2_3.pdf (дата обращения: 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bylund P.L. The division of labor and the firm: An Austrian attempt at explaining the firm in the market. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2011;14(2):188–215. URL: https://cdn.mises.org/qjae14_2_3.pdf (accessed on 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Капитал. Т.I. Соч. 2-е изд. Т. 23. Пер. с нем. М.: Госполитиздат; 1960. 908 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K., Engels F. Capital. Vol. 1. In: Collected works. 2nd ed. Vol. 23. Transl. from German. Moscow: Gospolitizdat; 1960. 908 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Walsh A., Brady M. Intra-firm coordination through rule-following and the emergence of hierarchy. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2019;22(3):357–382. DOI: 10.35297/qjae.010026</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Walsh A., Brady M. Intra-firm coordination through rule-following and the emergence of hierarchy. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2019;22(3):357–382. DOI: 10.35297/qjae.010026</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сухих В. В. К. Маркс о доверии в капиталистической экономике. Журнал экономической теории. 2018;15(4):659–662. DOI: 10.31063/2073–6517/2018.15–4.12</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sukhikh V.V. K. Marx and trust in the capitalist economy. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii = Russian Journal of the Economic Theory. 2018;15(4):659–662. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31063/2073–6517/2018.15–4.12</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Фукуяма Ф. Доверие. Социальные добродетели и путь к процветанию. Пер. с англ. М.: АСТ; Ермак; 2004. 730 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fukuyama F. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press; 1996. 480 p. (Russ. ed.: Fukuyama F. Doverie: sotsial’nye dobrodeteli i put’ k protsvetaniyu. Moscow: AST; Ermak; 2004. 730 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Попов Е.В., Стриелковски В., Власов М.В. Цифровизация интеллектуальной деятельности российских регионов. Управленец. 2020;11(1):24–32. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2020–11–1–3</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popov E.V., Strielkowski V., Vlasov M.V. Digitalization of intellectual activity of Russian regions. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2020;11(1):24–32. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2020–11–1–3</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bylund P. What we know and what we don’t know about the firm. Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/library/what-we-know-and-what-we-dont-know-about-firm (дата обращения: 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bylund P. What we know and what we don’t know about the firm. Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/library/what-we-know-and-what-we-dont-know-about-firm (accessed on 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Vijayan J. Downsizing leave firms vulnerable to digital attacks: Disgruntled castoffs pose security threat. Computerworld. June 25, 2001. URL: https://www.computerworld.com/article/2582182/downsizings-leavefirms-vulnerable-to-digital-attacks.html (дата обращения: 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vijayan J. Downsizing leave firms vulnerable to digital attacks: Disgruntled castoffs pose security threat. Computerworld. June 25, 2001. URL: https://www.computerworld.com/article/2582182/downsizings-leavefirms-vulnerable-to-digital-attacks.html (accessed on 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Piturro M. Alternatives to downsizing. Management Review. 1999;88(9):37–42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Piturro M. Alternatives to downsizing. Management Review. 1999;88(9):37–42.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bylund P. The division of labor is at the very core of economic growth. Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/wire/division-labor-very-core-economic-growth (дата обращения: 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bylund P. The division of labor is at the very core of economic growth. Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/wire/division-labor-very-core-economic-growth (accessed on 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bylund P. The firm and the division of labor. Mises Institute. 2011. URL: https://mises.org/library/firm-anddivision-labor (дата обращения: 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bylund P. The firm and the division of labor. Mises Institute. 2011. URL: https://mises.org/library/firm-anddivision-labor (accessed on 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гимпельсон В. Е., Капелюшников Р. И. Жить «в тени» или умереть «на свету»?: неформальность на российском рынке труда. Вопросы экономики. 2013;(11):65–88. DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2013–11–65–88</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gimpelson V.E., Kapeliushnikov R.I. To live in the shadows or die in the light: Informality in the Russian labor market. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013(11):65–88. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2013–11–65–88</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Machaj M. The problem of production: A new theory of the firm. Book review. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2018;21(4):427–435. URL: https://cdn.mises.org/The%20Problem%20of%20Production%20A%20New%20Theory%20of%20the%20Firm.pdf (дата обращения: 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Machaj M. The problem of production: A new theory of the firm. Book review. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2018;21(4):427–435. URL: https://cdn.mises.org/The%20Problem%20of%20Production%20A%20New%20Theory%20of%20the%20Firm.pdf (accessed on 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Макашов И.Н., Овчинникова Н.В. Управленческая мысль Западной Европы, США и Японии (XIX–XX вв.). М.: Спутник+; 2011. 744 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Makashov I. N., Ovchinnikova N.V. Managerial thought in Western Europe, USA and Japan (XIX–XX centuries). Moscow: Sputnik+; 2011. 744 p. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мацкуляк И.Д. Политико-экономическая природа рыночных отношений. М.: КноРус; 2020. 442 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matskulyak I.D. The political and economic nature of market relations. Moscow: KnoRus; 2020. 442 р. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Одегов Ю.Г. и др. Рекрутинг как система: содержание и основные технологии работы. Международный журнал экспериментального образования. 2016;(10–1):156.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Odegov Yu.G. et al. Recruiting as a system: Content and basic technologies of work. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya = International Journal of Experimental Education. 2016;(10–1):156. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смит А. Исследование о природе и причинах богатства народов. Пер. с англ. М.: Эксмо; 2007. 1056 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smith A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Methuen &amp; Co., Ltd.; 1904. 1152 p. (Russ. ed.: Smith A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. Moscow: Eksmo; 2007. 956 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мокир Дж. Дары Афины. Исторические истоки экономики знаний. Пер. с англ. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара; 2012. 408 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mokyr J. The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2004. 384 p. (Russ. ed.: Mokyr J. Dary Afiny. Istoricheskie istoki ekonomiki znanii. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ.; 2012. 408 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">О’Хара Ф. Современные принципы неортодоксальной политической экономии. Вопросы экономики. 2009:(12):38–57. DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2009–12–38–57</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">O’Hara Ph. Contemporary principles of heterodox political economy. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2009;(12):38–57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2009–12–38–57</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хаусман Д., ред. Философия экономики. Антология. Пер. с англ. М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара; 2012. 520 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hausman D. M., ed. The philosophy of economics: An anthology. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007. 538 p. (Russ. ed.: Hausman D., ed. Filosofiya ekonomiki: Antologiya. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ.; 2012. 520 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мизес Л. фон. Человеческая деятельность: трактат по экономической теории. Пер. с нем. Челябинск: Социум; 2008. 878 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mises L. von. Nationalökonomie: Theorie des Handelns und Wirtschaftens. München: Verlag Philosophia; 1980. 756 p. (Russ. ed.: Mises L. von. Chelovecheskaya deyatel’nost’: Traktat po ekonomicheskoi teorii. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium; 2008. 878 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аммус С. Краткая история денег, или все, что нужно знать о биткоине. Пер. с англ. М.: Манн, Иванов и Фербер; 2019. 272 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ammous S. The Bitcoin standard: The decentralized alternative to central banking. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.; 2018. 305 p. (Russ. ed.: Ammous S. Kratkaya istoriya deneg, ili vse, chto nuzhno znat’ o bitkoine. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2019. 272 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bylund P. What most critics of “markets” get wrong about entrepreneurs. Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/wire/what-most-critics-markets-get-wrong-about-entrepreneurs (дата обращения: 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bylund P. What most critics of “markets” get wrong about entrepreneurs. Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/wire/what-most-critics-markets-get-wrong-about-entrepreneurs (accessed on 02.06.2020).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хайек Ф.А. Индивидуализм и экономический порядок. Пер. с англ. Челябинск: Социум; 2011. 394 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hayek F.A. Individualism and economic order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1996. 280 p. (Russ. ed.: Hayek F.A. Individualizm i ekonomicheskii poryadok. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium; 2011. 394 p.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
