<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">managementscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Управленческие науки / Management Sciences</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Management Sciences</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2304-022X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2618-9941</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26794/2404-022X-2021-11-2-6-23</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">managementscience-309</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА УПРАВЛЕНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>THEORY AND PRACTICE OF MANAGEMENT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Экономико-статистический анализ факторов роста производительности труда на российских промышленных предприятиях</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Economic and statistical analyses of labor productivity growth at russian industrial enterprises: Key factors</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1766-8029</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Михненко</surname><given-names>П. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Mikhnenko</surname><given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Павел Александрович Михненко, доктор экономических наук, доцент, профессор кафедры «Предпринимательство и внешнеэкономическая деятельность»</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Pavel A. Mikhnenko, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Entrepreneurship and Foreign Economic Activity</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">pmihnenko@bmstu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>МГТУ имени Н. Э. Баумана</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Bauman Moscow State Technical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>26</day><month>05</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>6</fpage><lpage>23</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Михненко П.А., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Михненко П.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Mikhnenko P.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/309">https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/309</self-uri><abstract><p>Повышение производительности труда является актуальной задачей российской экономики и менеджмента предприятий. Сегодня в стране накапливается разрыв в производительности между наиболее эффективными и отстающими предприятиями. Актуальной задачей исследования является выявление ключевых факторов, определяющих величины и темпы роста этого показателя в интересах раскрытия перспективных направлений и способов управления его повышением. Статья посвящена анализу финансово-экономических показателей, являющихся факторами устойчивого роста производительности труда на отечественных промышленных предприятиях, лидирующих по этому показателю в период 2017–2019 гг. Методологической базой стали положения теории факторов производства и теории производительности. Метод исследования базируется на теореме статистических гипотез. В качестве объекта исследования рассматривались 94 российских предприятия, являющиеся лидерами по приросту производительности труда в рассматриваемый период. Разработана экономико-статистическая модель факторов роста производительности труда и произведен расчет условных вероятностей гипотез, характеризующих диапазоны прироста этого показателя при наступлении событий, соответствующих приросту величин финансово-экономических показателей. Выделены ключевые факторы и диапазоны их изменения для четырех диапазонов темпа производительности: малого, умеренного, высокого и рекордного. Показано, что определяющими факторами малого темпа являются прирост выручки в диапазоне от –23 до 57%, уменьшение длительности операционного цикла до –7% и прирост оборачиваемости активов до 37%. Факторами рекордного темпа являются темп выручки в диапазоне от 97 до 297%, сокращение периода операционного цикла в диапазоне от –42 до –88% и увеличение коэффициента оборачиваемости активов в диапазоне от 114 до 342%. Прирост фондовооруженности может рассматриваться в качестве фактора, обеспечивающего низкую вероятность умеренного и высокого темпов прироста производительности труда. Предложенный подход позволил выявить существенные факторы увеличения этого показателя на предприятиях-лидерах, не очевидные при использовании регрессионного анализа.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Increasing labor productivity (LP) is an actual task of the Russian economy and management of enterprises. Today, the country has a growing productivity gap between the most efﬁcient and lagging companies. The aim of the study is to identify the key factors which determine the magnitude and growth rate of this indicator in the interests of revealing promising areas and ways of managing its growth. The paper describes the analysis of ﬁnancial and economic indicators that are factors of sustainable growth in LP at domestic industrial enterprises, leading in this indicator in the period 2017–2019. The methodological basis has been the provisions of the production factors and productivity theories. The research method is based on the theorem of statistical hypotheses. The object of this research has been 94 Russian leading companies in terms of LP growth under reviewing period. An economic and statistical model of LP growth factors has been developed and the conditional probabilities of hypotheses have been calculated that characterize the ranges of growth of this indicator upon the occurrence of events corresponding to an increase in the values of ﬁnancial and economic indicators. The key factors and the ranges of their change are highlighted for four ranges of the productivity rate: small, moderate, high and record. It is shown that the determining factors of a low rate are a revenue growth in the range from –23 to 57%, a decrease in the duration of an operating cycle to –7% and a growth in asset turnover up to 37%. The factors of the record rate of LP growth are revenue gain in the range 97–297%; operating cycle reduction in the range from –42 to –88% and the turnover of assets gain in the range 114–342%. The capital-labor ratio gain is considered with low probability as a factor of the moderate or high LP gain in combination with an increase in revenue and asset turnover. High correlation of the operating cycle reduction and increase the asset turnover can serve as an indicator of LP increase programs success. The proposed approach allowed to identify signiﬁcant factors of LP growth at leading companies that had not been obvious during applying a regression analysis.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>производительность труда</kwd><kwd>промышленные предприятия</kwd><kwd>темп прироста</kwd><kwd>ключевые факторы</kwd><kwd>формула Байеса</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>labor productivity</kwd><kwd>industrial enterprises</kwd><kwd>growth rate</kwd><kwd>key factors</kwd><kwd>Bayes formula</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аганбегян А. Г. Какой комплексный план до 2025 года нужен России? Экономическая политика. 2017;12(4):8–29. DOI: 10.18288/1994–5124–2017–4–01</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aganbegian A. G. What comprehensive plan until 2025 does Russia need? Ekonomicheskaya politika = Economic Policy. 2017;12(4):8–29. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18288/1994–5124–2017–4–01</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бессонова Е. В. Анализ динамики совокупной производительности факторов на российских предприятиях (2009–2015 гг.). Вопросы экономики. 2018;(7):96–118.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bessonova E.V. Analysis of Russian ﬁrms’ TFP growth in 2009–2015. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2018;(7):96–118. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Blöchliger H., Wildnerova L. Productivity of the Russian ﬁrms: Seven stylized facts. Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2020;(4):217–227. DOI: 10.31737/2221–2264–2020–48–4–11</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Blöchliger H., Wildnerova L. Productivity of the Russian firms: Seven stylized facts. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2020;(4):217–227. DOI: 10.31737/2221–2264–2020–48–4–11</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lannelongue G., Gonzalez-Benito J., Quiroz I. Environmental management and labour productivity: The moderating role of capital intensity. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017;190:158–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.051</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lannelongue G., Gonzalez-Benito J., Quiroz I. Environmental management and labour productivity: The moderating role of capital intensity. Journal of Environmental Management. 2017;190:158–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.051</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tarancón M.-Á., Gutiérrez-Pedrero M.-J., Callejas F. E., Martínez-Rodríguez I. Verifying the relation between labor productivity and productive efﬁciency by means of the properties of the input-output matrices. The European case. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018;195:54–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.004</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tarancón M.-Á., Gutiérrez-Pedrero M.-J., Callejas F. E., Martínez-Rodríguez I. Verifying the relation between labor productivity and productive efﬁciency by means of the properties of the input-output matrices. The European case. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018;195:54–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.004</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лядова Е. В. Анализ динамики производительности труда в России: макроэкономический аспект. Вестник Нижегородского университета им. Н. И. Лобачевского. Серия: Социальные науки. 2017;(1):46–53.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lyadova E.V. Analysis of the dynamics of labor productivity in Russia: The macroeconomic aspect. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial’nye nauki = Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences. 2017;(1):46–53. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кутукова Е. С. О некоторых подходах к оценке производительности труда в современной российской экономике. Государственный аудит. Право. Экономика. 2017;(3–4):129–135.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kutukova E. S. On some approaches to valuation of performance rating in the modern Russian economy. Gosudarstvennyi audit. Pravo. Ekonomika. 2017;(3–4):129–135. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бурцева Т.А. Эконометрические модели региональной производительности труда. Вопросы статистики. 2017;(3):30–36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burtseva T.A. Econometric models of regional labour productivity. Voprosy statistiki. 2017;(3):30–36. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гореева Н. М., Демидова Л. Н. Динамическая модель и прогнозирование тенденций производительности труда в сельском хозяйстве. Экономика сельскохозяйственных и перерабатывающих предприятий. 2020;(2):44–48. DOI: 10.31442/0235–2494–2020–0–2–44–48</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goreeva N. M., Demidova L. N. Dynamic model and forecasting of labor productivity trends in agriculture. Ekonomika sel’skokhozyaistvennykh i pererabatyvayushchikh predpriyatii = Economy of Agricultural and Processing Enterprises. 2020;(2):44–48. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31442/0235–2494–2020–0–2–44–48</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумилина В. Е., Цвиль М. М. Построение модели регрессии по временным рядам с целью прогнозирования индекса производительности труда в Российской Федерации. Вестник Евразийской науки. 2020;12(1):73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shumilina V. E., Tsvil M. M. Building a time series regression model with the aim of predicting the labor productivity index in the Russian Federation. Vestnik Evraziiskoi nauki = The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2020;12(1):73. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grenčíková A., Kordoš M., Berkovic V. Impact of Industry 4.0 on labor productivity in the Slovak Republic. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2020;18(2):396–408. DOI: 10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.32</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grenčíková A., Kordoš M., Berkovic V. Impact of Industry 4.0 on labor productivity in the Slovak Republic. Problems and Perspectives in Management. 2020;18(2):396–408. DOI: 10.21511/ppm.18(2).2020.32</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бессонова Е. В., Морозов А. Г., Турдыева Н. А., Цветкова А. Н. Возможности ускорения роста производительности труда: роль малых и средних предприятий. Вопросы экономики. 2020;(3):98–114. DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2020–3–98–114</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bessonova E.V., Morozov A. G., Turdyeva N.A., Tsvetkova A. N. Opportunities for accelerating labor productivity growth: The role of small and medium enterprises. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2020;(3):98–114. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2020–3–98–114</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Растворцева С. Н. Производительность труда и фондовооруженность в обеспечении экономического роста российских регионов. Социальное пространство. 2018;(1):1. DOI: 10.15838/sa/2018.1.13.1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rastvortseva S. N. Labor productivity and capital to labor ratio in ensuring the economic growth of the Russian regions. Social’noe prostranstvo = Social Area. 2018;(1):1. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15838/sa/2018.1.13.1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gardiner B., Fingleton B., Martin B. Regional disparities in labour productivity and the role of capital stock. National Institute Economic Review. 2020;253:29–43. DOI: 10.1017/nie.2020.28</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gardiner B., Fingleton B., Martin B. Regional disparities in labour productivity and the role of capital stock. National Institute Economic Review. 2020;253:29–43. DOI: 10.1017/nie.2020.28</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Durdyev S. Labour productivity improvement: Impact levels of the on-site vonstraints. Atlanta, GA: Scholars’ Press; 2014. 120 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Durdyev S. Labour productivity improvement: Impact levels of the on-site vonstraints. Atlanta, GA: Scholars’ Press; 2014. 120 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mairesse J., Jaumandreu J. Panel-data estimates of the production function and the revenue function: What difference does it make? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 2005;107(4):651–672. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9442.2005.00431.x</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mairesse J., Jaumandreu J. Panel-data estimates of the production function and the revenue function: What difference does it make? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics. 2005;107(4):651–672. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–9442.2005.00431.x</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Leeuwen G., Klomp L. On the contribution of innovation to multi-factor productivity growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2006;15(4–5):367–390. DOI: 10.1080/10438590500512927</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Leeuwen G., Klomp L. On the contribution of innovation to multi-factor productivity growth. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. 2006;15(4–5):367–390. DOI: 10.1080/10438590500512927</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roper S., Du J., Love J. H. Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy. 2008;37(6–7):961–977. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roper S., Du J., Love J. H. Modelling the innovation value chain. Research Policy. 2008;37(6–7):961–977. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roth F. Revisiting intangible capital and labour productivity growth, 2000–2015: Accounting for the crisis and economic recovery in the EU. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2020;21(5):671–690. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-05–2019–0119</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roth F. Revisiting intangible capital and labour productivity growth, 2000–2015: Accounting for the crisis and economic recovery in the EU. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2020;21(5):671–690. DOI: 10.1108/JIC-05–2019–0119</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Woltjer G., van Galen M., Logatcheva K. Industrial innovation, labour productivity, sales and employment. International Journal of the Economics of Business. 2021;28(1):89–113. DOI: 10.1080/13571516.2019.1695448</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Woltjer G., van Galen M., Logatcheva K. Industrial innovation, labour productivity, sales and employment. International Journal of the Economics of Business. 2021;28(1):89–113. DOI: 10.1080/13571516.2019.1695448</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Li J., Miao E., Zhang J. The legal environment, specialized investments, incomplete contracts, and labor productivity. China Economic Review. 2021;66:101583. DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101583</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Li J., Miao E., Zhang J. The legal environment, specialized investments, incomplete contracts, and labor productivity. China Economic Review. 2021;66:101583. DOI: 10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101583</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pariboni R., Tridico P. Structural change, institutions and the dynamics of labor productivity in Europe. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2020;30(5):1275–1300. DOI: 10.1007/s00191–019–00641-y</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pariboni R., Tridico P. Structural change, institutions and the dynamics of labor productivity in Europe. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2020;30(5):1275–1300. DOI: 10.1007/s00191–019–00641-y</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Долженко Р.А., Лобова С. В. Идентификация высокопроизводительных рабочих мест на основе методик Росстата. Экономика региона. 2019;15(4):1169–1183. DOI: 10.17059/2019–4–16</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dolzhenko R.A., Lobova S.V. Identiﬁcation of high-performance workplaces on the basis of the methods of the Russian Federal State Statistics Service. Ekonomika regiona = Economy of Region. 2019;15(4):1169–1183. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17059/2019–4–16</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Орлова Е. В. Управление производительностью труда с учетом факторов здоровья: технология и модели. Управленец. 2020;11(6):57–69. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2020–11–6–5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Orlova E.V. Labour productivity management using health factors: Technique and models. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2020;11(6):57–69. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2020–11–6–5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Johari S., Jha K. N. Impact of work motivation on construction labor productivity. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2020;36(5):04020052. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943–5479.0000824</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Johari S., Jha K. N. Impact of work motivation on construction labor productivity. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2020;36(5):04020052. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943–5479.0000824</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bosworth B. P., Triplett J. E. The early 21st century U.S. productivity expansion is still in services. International Productivity Monitor. 2007;14:3–19.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bosworth B. P., Triplett J. E. The early 21st century U.S. productivity expansion is still in services. International Productivity Monitor. 2007;14:3–19.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bartelsman E. J., Haltiwanger J. C., Scarpetta S. Cross-country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. American Economic Review. 2013;103(1):305–334. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.1.305</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bartelsman E. J., Haltiwanger J. C., Scarpetta S. Cross-country differences in productivity: The role of allocation and selection. American Economic Review. 2013;103(1):305–334. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.1.305</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Tam N., Quoc Toan N., Tuan Hai D., Le Dinh Qu N. Critical factors affecting construction labor productivity: A comparison between perceptions of project managers and contractors. Cogent Business &amp; Management. 2021;8(1):1863303. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1863303</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Tam N., Quoc Toan N., Tuan Hai D., Le Dinh Qu N. Critical factors affecting construction labor productivity: A comparison between perceptions of project managers and contractors. Cogent Business &amp; Management. 2021;8(1):1863303. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2020.1863303</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Симачев Ю. В., Кузык М. Г., Федюнина А.А., Юревич М.А. Производительность труда в российских компаниях: как содействовать устойчивому росту. Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. 2020;(4):205–217. DOI: 10.31737/2221–2264–2020–48–4–10</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simachev Yu.V., Kuzyk M. G., Fedyunina A.A., Yurevich M.A. Labor productivity in Russian companies: How to foster sustainable growth. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2020;(4):205–217. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31737/2221–2264–2020–48–4–10</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Балацкий Е. В., Юревич М.А. Технологический эффект масштаба и экономический рост. Terra Economicus. 2020;18(1):43–57. DOI: 10.18522/2073–6606–2020–18–1–43–57</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balatsky E. V., Yurevich M. A. Technological economies of scale and economic growth. Terra Economicus. 2020;18(1):43–57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18522/2073–6606–2020–18–1–43–57</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
