managementscienceУправленческие науки / Management SciencesManagement Sciences2304-022X2618-9941Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation10.26794/2304-022X-2025-15-3-69-89managementscience-706Research ArticleУПРАВЛЕНИЕ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЕЙORGANIZATION MANAGEMENTУточнение принципов устойчивого развития организации в условиях развивающейся экономикиClarifying the Principles of Sustainable Development of an Organization in the Context of an Emerging Economyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-0684ТкаченкоИ. Н.TkachenkoI. N.

Ирина Николаевна Ткаченко — доктор экономических наук, профессор, заведующаякафедрой корпоративной экономики и управления бизнесом, Уральский государственный экономический университет

Екатеринбург

Irina N. Tkachenko — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Head of the Department of Corporate Economics and Business Management

Yekaterinburg

Tkachenko@usue.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4360-570XТумилевичЕ. Н.TumilevichE. N.

Елена Николаевна Тумилевич — кандидат экономических наук, доцент высшей экономической школы, Тихоокеанский государственный университе

Хабаровск

Elena N. Tumilevich — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Assoc. Prof. of the High Economic School

Khabarovsk

elena-tumilevich@yandex.ruУральский государственный экономический университетРоссияUral State University of EconomicsRussian FederationТихоокеанский государственный университетРоссияPacific National UniversityRussian Federation2025250920251536989Copyright © Ткаченко И.Н., Тумилевич Е.Н., 20252025Ткаченко И.Н., Тумилевич Е.Н.Tkachenko I.N., Tumilevich E.N.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/view/706

Целью исследования явилось уточнение и обоснование принципов устойчивого развития организации на современном этапе развития российской экономики. С помощью таких методов, как систематический анализ научной литературы и эмпирических данных, а также конфирматорный факторный анализ в ходе работы были выделены и верифицированы пять фундаментальных принципов, формирующих основу устойчивого развития компании: долгосрочная ориентация, интегрированное управление ESG, мультистейкхолдерская ценность, устойчивость к кризисам и адаптивные инновации,— и определены ключевые аспекты их реализации. Результаты исследования могут быть использованы организациями для формирования долгосрочных стратегий, минимизации рисков, повышения конкурентоспособности и обеспечения сбалансированного взаимодействия с заинтересованными сторонами, разработки корпоративных политик для достижения целей в области устойчивого развития.

The aim of this study is to clarify and justify the principles of sustainable organizational development at the current stage of Russia’s economic evolution. Using such methods like systematic analysis of academic literature and empirical data, as well as confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), the researchers identified and validated five fundamental principles forming the basis of corporate sustainable development: long-term orientation, integrated ESG management, multi-stakeholder value, crisis resilience, and adaptive innovation. Key aspects of implementing these principles were also outlined. The findings of the study can be applied by organizations in the development of long-term strategies, risk minimization, enhancement of competitiveness, and the establishment of balanced stakeholder relationships. They also offer a foundation for designing corporate policies aimed at achieving sustainable development goals.

устойчивое развитиеESG-политикадолгосрочная стратегиямультистейкхолдерский подходустойчивость к кризисамадаптивные инновациикорпоративная социальная ответственностьsustainable developmentESG-policylong-term strategymulti-stakeholder approachcrisis resilienceadaptive innovationcorporate social responsibilityReferencesSpringett D. Business conceptions of sustainable development: A perspective from critical theory. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2003;12(2):71–86. DOI: 10.1002/bse.353Springett D. Business conceptions of sustainable development: A perspective from critical theory. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2003;12(2):71–86. DOI: 10.1002/bse.353Jöreskog K.G. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1969;34(2):183–202. DOI: 10.1007/BF02289343Jöreskog K.G. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1969;34(2):183–202. DOI: 10.1007/BF02289343Weder F. Sustainability as guiding principle of communicative action the transformative and transformational potential of corporate sustainability communication as niche construction, a case from the energy sector. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. 2025;30(2):241–259. DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ 12–2023–0184Weder F. Sustainability as guiding principle of communicative action the transformative and transformational potential of corporate sustainability communication as niche construction, a case from the energy sector. Corporate Communications: An International Journal. 2025;30(2):241–259. DOI: 10.1108/CCIJ 12–2023–0184Мнацаканян А.Г., Харин А.Г. Принципы устойчивого развития в управлении компанией. Социальноэкономические явления и процессы. 2016;11(10):41–50. DOI: 10.20310/1819–8813–2016–11–10–41–50Mnatsakanyan A.G., Kharin A.G. The principles of sustainable development in company management. Social’no-ekonomicheskie yavleniya i processy = Socio-Economic Phenomena and Processes. 2016;11(10):41– 50. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20310/1819–8813–2016–11–10–41–50Najm N.A., Yousif A. S.H., Al-Ensour J.A., Alnidawy A.A. The impact of sustainability principles on organizational commitments and the mediating effect of digital transformation process. In: Yaseen S.G., ed. Cutting-edge business technologies in the Big Data era (SICB 2023). Cham: Springer; 2023:273–288. (Studies in Big Data. Vol. 136). DOI: 10.1007/978–3–031–42455–7_25Najm N.A., Yousif A. S.H., Al-Ensour J.A., Alnidawy A.A. The impact of sustainability principles on organizational commitments and the mediating effect of digital transformation process. In: Yaseen S.G., ed. Cutting-edge business technologies in the Big Data era (SICB 2023). Cham: Springer; 2023:273–288. (Studies in Big Data. Vol. 136). DOI: 10.1007/978–3–031–42455–7_25Muñoz-Torres M.J., Fernández-Izquierdo M.Á., Rivera-Lirio J.M., et al. An assessment tool to integrate sustainability principles into the global supply chain. Sustainability. 2018;10(2):535. DOI: 10.3390/su10020535Muñoz-Torres M.J., Fernández-Izquierdo M.Á., Rivera-Lirio J.M., et al. An assessment tool to integrate sustainability principles into the global supply chain. Sustainability. 2018;10(2):535. DOI: 10.3390/su10020535Sriram K., Ganesh L. S., Madhumathi R. Inferring principles for sustainable development of business through analogies from ecological systems. IIMB Management Review. 2013;25(1):36–48. DOI: 10.1016/j. iimb.2012.10.00Sriram K., Ganesh L. S., Madhumathi R. Inferring principles for sustainable development of business through analogies from ecological systems. IIMB Management Review. 2013;25(1):36–48. DOI: 10.1016/j. iimb.2012.10.00Suriyo O., Sawatenarakul N., Worawattanaparinya S. Guidelines of industrial business development by good governance principles for sustainable growth. Academy of Strategic Management Journal. 2021;20(2):1–11. URL: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Guidelines-of-industrial-businessdevelopment-by-good-governance-principles-for-sustainable-growth 1939–6104–20–2–733.pdfSuriyo O., Sawatenarakul N., Worawattanaparinya S. Guidelines of industrial business development by good governance principles for sustainable growth. Academy of Strategic Management Journal. 2021;20(2):1–11. URL: https://www.abacademies.org/articles/Guidelines-of-industrial-businessdevelopment-by-good-governance-principles-for-sustainable-growth 1939–6104–20–2–733.pdfКолобов А.В. Ключевые принципы устойчивого развития бизнес-системы предприятия. Управленческие науки. 2020;10(3):21–32. DOI: 10.26794/2404–022X 2020–10–3–21–32Kolobov A. V. Key principles of sustainable development of a company’s business system. Upravlencheskie nauki = Management Sciences. 2020;10(3):21–32. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2404– 022X 2020–10–3–21–32Батаева Б.С., Кокурина А.Д., Карпов Н.А. Влияние раскрытия ESG-показателей на финансовые результаты российских публичных компаний. Управленец. 2021;12(6):20–32. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2021–12–6–2Bataeva B. S., Kokurina A. D., Karpov N.A. The impact of ESG reporting on the financial performance of Russian public companies. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2021;12(6):20–32. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2021–12–6–2Khoruzhy L. I., Katkov Y. N., Romanova A. A., Katkova E. A., Dzhikiya M. K. Adaptive management reporting system in inter-organizational relations of agricultural enterprises according to ESG principles. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 2022;6(2):1649. DOI: 10.24294/jipd. v6i2.1649Khoruzhy L. I., Katkov Y. N., Romanova A. A., Katkova E. A., Dzhikiya M. K. Adaptive management reporting system in inter-organizational relations of agricultural enterprises according to ESG principles. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 2022;6(2):1649. DOI: 10.24294/jipd. v6i2.1649Bugaeva M.V., Tregulova N. G., Vasenev S. L., Lukomets A.V. Improving entrepreneurial efficiency through the implementation of ESG principles in human resource management. In: Popkova E.G., ed. Smart green innovations in Industry 4.0: New opportunities for climate change risk management in the “Decade of Action”. Cham: Springer; 2023:315–323. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–031–45830–9_35Bugaeva M.V., Tregulova N. G., Vasenev S. L., Lukomets A.V. Improving entrepreneurial efficiency through the implementation of ESG principles in human resource management. In: Popkova E.G., ed. Smart green innovations in Industry 4.0: New opportunities for climate change risk management in the “Decade of Action”. Cham: Springer; 2023:315–323. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–031–45830–9_35Glonti V., Trynchuk V., Khovrak I., et al. Socialization of organization sustainable development based on the principles of corporate social responsibility. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 2020;16(1):169–182. DOI: 10.14254/1800–5845/2020.16–1.11Glonti V., Trynchuk V., Khovrak I., et al. Socialization of organization sustainable development based on the principles of corporate social responsibility. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. 2020;16(1):169–182. DOI: 10.14254/1800–5845/2020.16–1.11Тумилевич Е. Н. Построение системы корпоративной социальной ответственности в компании. Российское предпринимательство. 2012;(23):30–37. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/postroeniesistemy-korporativnoy-sotsialnoy-otvetstvennosti-v-kompaniiTumilevich E. N. Building a system of corporate social responsibility in the company. Rossiiskoe predprinimatel’stvo = Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. 2012;(23):30–37. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/postroenie-sistemy-korporativnoy-sotsialnoy-otvetstvennosti-v-kompanii (In Russ.).Чудинов О.О. Корпоративная социальная ответственность как доминанта устойчивого развития. Экономика. Налоги. Право. 2024;17(3):96–105. DOI: 10.26794/1999–849X 2024–17–3–96–105Chudinov O. O. Corporate social responsibility as the dominant factor of sustainable development. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo = Economics, Taxes & Law. 2024;17(3):96–105. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/1999–849X 2024–17–3–96–105Ткаченко И. Н., Первухина И. В., Злыгостев А.А. Моделирование вклада и выгод стейкхолдеров компании. Управленец. 2020;11(2):2–15. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2020–11–2–1Tkachenko I. N., Pervukhina I.V., Zlygostev A.A. Modeling the contribution and benefits of company stakeholders. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2020;11(2):2–15. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2020–11–2–1Вавилина А.В., Леванова Л.Н., Ткаченко И.Н. Взаимосвязь дивидендной политики и корпоративной репутации в российских компаниях. Управленец. 2019;10(4):14–23. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003– 2019–10–4–2Vavilina A.V., Levanova L. N., Tkachenko I. N. Interrelation between dividend policy and corporate reputation in Russian companies. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2019;10(4):14–23. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2019–10–4–2Eccles R.G., Ioannou I., Serafeim G. The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science. 2014;60(11):2835–2857. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984Eccles R.G., Ioannou I., Serafeim G. The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science. 2014;60(11):2835–2857. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984Albuquerque R., Koskinen Y., Zhang C. Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science. 2019;65(10):4451–4469. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043Albuquerque R., Koskinen Y., Zhang C. Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: Theory and empirical evidence. Management Science. 2019;65(10):4451–4469. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3043Khan M., Serafeim G., Yoon A. Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review. 2016;91(6):1697–1724. DOI: 10.2308/accr 51383Khan M., Serafeim G., Yoon A. Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review. 2016;91(6):1697–1724. DOI: 10.2308/accr 51383Hoepner A. G., Oikonomou I., Sautner Z., Starks L. T., Zhou X. Y. ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. Review of Finance. 2024;28(2):483–510. DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfad034Hoepner A. G., Oikonomou I., Sautner Z., Starks L. T., Zhou X. Y. ESG shareholder engagement and downside risk. Review of Finance. 2024;28(2):483–510. DOI: 10.1093/rof/rfad034Amore M. D., Bennedsen M. Corporate governance and green innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2016;75:54–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.003Amore M. D., Bennedsen M. Corporate governance and green innovation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 2016;75:54–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.003Henisz W., Koller T., Nuttall R. Five ways that ESG creates value. McKinsey Quarterly. 2019;(4):1–12.Henisz W., Koller T., Nuttall R. Five ways that ESG creates value. McKinsey Quarterly. 2019;(4):1–12.Hahn R., Lülfs R. Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics. 2014;123(3):401–420. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–013–1801–4Hahn R., Lülfs R. Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics. 2014;123(3):401–420. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–013–1801–4King A.A., Lenox M.J. Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2001;5(1):105–116. DOI: 10.1162/108819801753358526King A.A., Lenox M.J. Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2001;5(1):105–116. DOI: 10.1162/108819801753358526Harrison J. S., Bosse D.A., Phillips R.A. Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal. 2010;31(1):58–74. DOI: 10.1002/smj.801Harrison J. S., Bosse D.A., Phillips R.A. Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal. 2010;31(1):58–74. DOI: 10.1002/smj.801Edmans A. Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics. 2011;101(3):621–640. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021Edmans A. Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics. 2011;101(3):621–640. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021Bansal S., Kaicker N. Corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance: A systematic literature review. Colombo Business Journal. 2024;15(2):87–114. DOI: 10.4038/cbj.v15i2.191Bansal S., Kaicker N. Corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance: A systematic literature review. Colombo Business Journal. 2024;15(2):87–114. DOI: 10.4038/cbj.v15i2.191Dhaliwal D., Li O.Z., Tsang A., Yang Y.G. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2014;33(4):328–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006Dhaliwal D., Li O.Z., Tsang A., Yang Y.G. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2014;33(4):328–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006Krueger P., Sautner Z., Starks L.T. The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies. 2020;33(3):1067–1111. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhz137Krueger P., Sautner Z., Starks L.T. The importance of climate risks for institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies. 2020;33(3):1067–1111. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhz137Linnenluecke M. K., Griffiths A., Winn M. Extreme weather events and the critical importance of anticipatory adaptation and organizational resilience in responding to impacts. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2012;21(1):17–32. DOI: 10.1002/bse.708Linnenluecke M. K., Griffiths A., Winn M. Extreme weather events and the critical importance of anticipatory adaptation and organizational resilience in responding to impacts. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2012;21(1):17–32. DOI: 10.1002/bse.708Teece D., Peteraf M., Leih S. Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review. 2016;58(4):13–35. DOI: 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13Teece D., Peteraf M., Leih S. Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review. 2016;58(4):13–35. DOI: 10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13Ambulkar S., Blackhurst J., Grawe S. Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management. 2015;33–34:111–122. DOI: 10.1016/j. jom.2014.11.002Ambulkar S., Blackhurst J., Grawe S. Firm’s resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management. 2015;33–34:111–122. DOI: 10.1016/j. jom.2014.11.002Bhamra R., Dani S., Burnard K. Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research. 2011;49(18):5375–5393. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.563826Bhamra R., Dani S., Burnard K. Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research. 2011;49(18):5375–5393. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2011.563826Sahebjamnia N., Torabi S. A., Mansouri S. A. Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018;197:63–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.009Sahebjamnia N., Torabi S. A., Mansouri S. A. Building organizational resilience in the face of multiple disruptions. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018;197:63–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.12.009Aghion P., Van Reenen J., Zingales L. Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review. 2013;103(1):277–304. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.1.277Aghion P., Van Reenen J., Zingales L. Innovation and institutional ownership. American Economic Review. 2013;103(1):277–304. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.1.277Benner M.J., Tushman M. L. Reflections on the 2013 Decade Award — “Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited” ten years later. Academy of Management Review. 2015;40(4):497–514. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2015.0042Benner M.J., Tushman M. L. Reflections on the 2013 Decade Award — “Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited” ten years later. Academy of Management Review. 2015;40(4):497–514. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2015.0042Bocken N. M.P., Short S.W., Rana P., Evans S. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014;65:42–56. DOI: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2013.11.039Bocken N. M.P., Short S.W., Rana P., Evans S. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2014;65:42–56. DOI: 10.1016/j. jclepro.2013.11.039

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.