INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND “NEW NORMALITY”

This article examines the issues relating to the implementation of the industrial policy and the national economy reindustrialization under the conditions of so-called “new normality”. It is mentioned that the reasons for “new normality” is a global inability to design new forms of activity, which led to a deficit of non-toxic assets in excess of money supply. The slowdown and the decline of global economic growth are the signs of this process. As the main instrument for overcoming the economic stagnation “normality” the intensification of efforts to import substitution is offered. It is substantiated that based on export-raw commodity model the new Russia industrialization is not feasible, as the solution of the problem of high-tech import substitution. There is a need to design and organize in Russia new national industries that have advanced competitiveness in the world economy, as a mechanism for the withdrawal of the global economy beyond the “new normality”. It is proposed to counterpose the “new normality” of the national innovation policy and pay attention to issues related to the long-term innovation and industrial development of the Russian economy, both in the sectoral and regional contexts.

«новая нормальность», industrial policy, reindustrialization, neoindustrialization, “new normality”, import substitution, export commodity model, financial policy, innovation activity, sustainable development

1. Bragina E. Novaya normal’nost’ [New normality]. Mirovoe i nacional’noe hozyajstvo — Global and national economy, 2012, no. 4 (23). URL: http://www.mirec.ru/2012–04/novaa-normalnost (accessed: 05.07.2017) (in Russian).

2. Tolkachev S.A., Teplyakov A.Y. EHkonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii: novaya promyshlennaya politika vs «novaya normal’nost’» [Economic development in Russia: a new industrial policy vs “new normality”]. URL: http://forum24. fa.ru/?p=1868 (accessed: 05.07.2017) (in Russian).

3. Abdikeyev N.M., Bogachev Yu.S. Diagnostika strukturnoj ustojchivosti ehkonomiki Rossii [Diagnostics of Russian economy structural sustainability]. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta — Bulletin of Financial University, 2017, no. 3, pp. 75–83 (in Russian).

4. Sukharev O.S. Promyshlennost’ Rossii: problemy razvitiya i sistemnye resheniya [Industry of Russia: problems of development and system solutions]. Vestnik IEH RAN — Bulletin of RAS, 2016, no. 2, pp. 69–87 (in Russian).

5. Tryuel J.-L., Rassadina A.K. Opyt francuzskogo planirovaniya v kontekste zadachi modernizacii rossijskoj ehkonomiki [Experience of French planning in the context of the Russian economy modernizing tasks]. EHkonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii — Economic revival of Russia, 2017, no. 1, pp. 51–62 (in Russian).

6. Babkin K.A. Finansovaya politika tormozit rossijskoe razvitie [Financial policy hampers Russian development]. Faktor stagnacii: demonetizaciya finansovo-ehkonomicheskoj sistemy Rossii i vyhod iz nee: materialy nauchnoehkspertnoj sessii. Moskva, 19 fevralya 2014 g. [A factor of stagnation: demonetization of financial and economic system in Russia and recovery. Proceedings of the scientific expert session. Moscow, February 19, 2014]. Moscow, Nauka i politika — Science and Policy, 2014, pp. 65–66 (in Russian).

7. Ryazanov V.T. Ciklicheskie i sistemnye prichiny krizisa v Rossii: rol’ socializacii finansov v ih preodolenii Cyclical and systemic causes of crisis in Russia: the role of finance socialization in overcoming it]. Voprosy politicheskoj ehkonomii — Issues of political economy, 2016, no. 2, pp. 88–106 (in Russian).

8. Gubanov S.S. Ot ehksportno-syr’evoj modeli k neoindustrial’noj ehkonomicheskoj sisteme [From raw-materials export model to neo-industrial economic system]. EHkonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii —Economic revival of Russia, 2015, no. 4, pp. 48–59 (in Russian).

9. Krupnov U.V. Za pyat’ shagov.Proektam importozameshcheniya nuzhna chetkaya strategiya [In five steps. Importsubstitution projects need clear strategy]. Rossiyskaya gazeta — Russian Newspaper, 2016, no. 6933 (65), March, 29 (in Russian).