Preview

Management Sciences

Advanced search

Regulatory Impact Assessment in Post-Soviet Countries: Results, Problems and Prospects

https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2018-8-2-84-93

Abstract

The subject of research is the institute of regulatory impact assessment, implemented in the sphere of state regulation of economy in post-Soviet countries. The research aims to analyze the main approaches to the implementation of the regulatory impact assessment in the post-Soviet countries — Russia, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, as well as to determine the prospects of development of this institute in the countries included in the analyzed set. Using the methodology of comparative research, the study collates the concept content of “regulatory impact assessment” in some of the post-soviet countries, the structure of the objects of assessment and government levels, at which it is performed. The research analyzes the methodological framework of the regulatory impact assessment and models of the organization of monitoring and quality control of regulatory impact assessment in the countries from the analyzed set. The paper characterizes the role of the regulatory impact assessment in the system of state regulation of economy in the countries of post-Soviet space, identifies the general and specific features in the functioning of the mechanisms of regulatory impact assessment in the analyzed countries, describes the problems of assessment in the activities of state authorities and local selfgovernment, and substantiates the development prospects of the institute of the regulatory impact assessment. The research provides findings on the need for improving the quality of the existing methodological support of the regulatory impact assessment, the lack of methodical approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of this institution, the risks of formalizing procedures of the regulatory impact assessment, and the feasibility of the regulatory impact assessment “integration” in the national strategy to encourage business and economic growth. Moreover, the paper notes that at the present stage of the development of the regulatory impact assessment institute little attention is paid to finding alternative solutions which require government interference in the economy.

 

About the Authors

I.  D. Turgel
Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Deputy Director for Research Graduate School of Economics and Management


A.  Zh. Panzabekova
Institute of Economics of Science Committee of the Education and Science Ministry, Almaty
Kazakhstan
Can. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Deputy Director for International Cooperation and Implementation


References

1. Sidorchuk I.P. Optimization of law regulation on the base of regulatory impact assessment. Law.by. 2017;(1):21– 25. (In Russ.).

2. Krivov V.D., Vladimirov D.G. Regulatory impact analysis as the base of the state decisions. Federalism. 2015;(1):111–118. (In Russ.).

3. Tsygankov D.B. Regulatory impact assessment in Russia, in: Regulatory Reforms — implementation and compliance: Proceedings of the tenth congress of the international association of legislation in Velikii Novgorod, June, 2012. Kabyshev S.V., Mader L., eds. Vol. 17. Baden-Baden: Nomos Publ., 2016:249–267.

4. Derman D.O. Regulatory impact assessment as a management innovation in the system of state regulation in Russia and CIS countries. Bulletin of Kazan Technological University. 2013;(11):278–281. (In Russ.).

5. Voloshinskaya A.A. Regulatory impact assessment in Russia and in the world: One similarity and seven differences. Public Administration. Electronic Bulletin. 2015;(49):52–74. (In Russ.).

6. Golodnikova A.E., Tsygankov D.B. “Targeting” regulatory impact assessment: International approaches and Russian practice. Questions of state and municipal government. 2015;(4):7–40. (In Russ.).

7. Turgel’ I.D., Vejbert S.I. Institute of Regulatory Impact Assessment in the CIS countries: a comprehensive analysis. Yekaterinburg: Ural institute — territorial branch of RANEPA Publ.; 2015. 96 р. (In Russ.).

8. Shamkov Yu.V., Doroshenko S.V. Institute of Policy Evaluation in the SCO area. The Economy of the Region. 2012;(4):212–217. (In Russ).

9. Karlyuk M. Лепшае дзяржаўнае рэгуляванне ў Беларусі праз ацэнку рэгулятыўнага ўплыву: policy brief. Minsk: Беларускі фонд публічнай палітыкі; 2012. 189 c. (In Belaruss).

10. Kysykova G.B. Tasks of scientific anti-corruption expertise of draft regulations (materials of the Republic of Kazakhstan). Theory and practice of social development. 2013;(4):287–289 (In Russ.).

11. Ahmetzhanova S., Kopeshova K. Improving of regulatory policy in state government: International and Kazakhstan experience. International journal of civil service reform and practice. 2016;(1). URL: https://www. astanahubjournal.org/index.php/ijcsrp/issue/view/17 (accessed 28.04.2017). (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Turgel I.D., Panzabekova A.Zh. Regulatory Impact Assessment in Post-Soviet Countries: Results, Problems and Prospects. Management Sciences. 2018;8(2):84-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2018-8-2-84-93

Views: 1170


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2304-022X (Print)
ISSN 2618-9941 (Online)