The development of managerial mechanisms to ensure a technological breakthrough in the Russian economy
https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2019-9-4-15-31
Abstract
The paper is devoted to improving managerial tools to ensure the effective implementation of technological breakthrough in the Russian economy. Solving the tasks of socio-economic development of the country, improving the quality of life of the population, ensuring its geopolitical position is impossible without accelerated economic growth. To ensure it, a technological breakthrough is needed in the Russian economy. In order to create appropriate conditions, new management mechanisms are needed in high-tech corporations. The methodological base of the study is based on the provisions of the theory of corporate governance, system, factor, functional and statistical analysis. The paper analyzes the experience of organizations of accelerated technological development and concludes on the effective structure of the managerial apparatus, which coordinates and monitors the activities of corporations. The main directions of state policy to ensure economic growth are identified, a factor analysis of its effectiveness and mechanisms for the formation of the conditions for the implementation of technological breakthrough are carried out. The domestic scientific potential of providing a technological breakthrough in the Russian economy is shown, the effectiveness of mechanisms for converting scientific achievements into breakthrough technologies is considered. The analysis results carried out in the work indicate the absence of a system of concentration of scientific potential for the creation of high-tech innovations. The structure of the scientific and technical platform for generating knowledge and its transformation into competitive technologies in priority sectors of the real sector of the economy is proposed, its organizational form is determined. The work results can be used in solving strategic problems of modernization of high-tech manufacturing industries.
About the Authors
O. I. Dontsova
Financial University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olesya I. Dontsova — Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor of the Academic Department of Economic theory
Moscow
N. M. Abdikeev
Financial University
Russian Federation
Niyaz M. Abdikeev — Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Director of the Institute for Industrial Policy and Institutional Development
Russian Federation
Niyaz M. Abdikeev — Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Director of the Institute for Industrial Policy and Institutional Development
Yu. S. Bogachev
Financial University
Russian Federation
Yurii S. Bogachev — Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Chief Researcher at the Institute for Industrial Policy and Institutional Development
Russian Federation
Yurii S. Bogachev — Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Chief Researcher at the Institute for Industrial Policy and Institutional Development
References
1. McMillan M., Rodrik D., Verduzco-Gallo Í. Globalization, structural change, and productivity growth, with an update on Africa. World Development. 2014;63:11–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.012
2. Yong L. Industrial development report 2013. Sustaining employment growth: The role of manufacturing and structural change. Vienna: UNIDO; 2013. 265 p. URL: http://www.unido.ru/upload/files/d/documenti/unido_idr_2013_eng.pdf (accessed on 22.04.2019).
3. Moiseichev E., Meshkova T. Russia in global value chains: In search of an effective strategy. Mosty = Bridges. 2015;(3):11–14. URL: https://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/review/Mosty%20June%202015_0.pdf (accessed on 24.04.2019). (In Russ.).
4. Ponomarev A., Dezhina I. Approaches to prioritizing the technological development of Russia. Forsait = Foresight and STI Governance. 2016;10(1):7–15. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1995–459X.2016.1.7.15
5. Gorodnikova N. V., Gokhberg L. M., Ditkovskii K. A. at al. Science. Technologies. Innovation: 2017. Brief statistical collection. Moscow: NRU HSE; 2017. 80 p. (In Russ.).
6. Gorodnikova N. V., Gokhberg L. M., Ditkovskii K. A. at al. Science. Technologies. Innovation: 2019. Brief statistical collection. Moscow: NRU HSE; 2019. 84 p. (In Russ.).
7. Gel’vanovskii M. Competitiveness: Micro, meso and macro levels. Methodology issues. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 2006;(10):32–40. (In Russ.).
8. Varshavskii A. E. Problematic innovations: Risks for humanity. Economic, social and ethical aspects. Moscow: Lenand; 2014. 328 p. (In Russ.).
9. Bagrinovskii K. A., Matyushok V. M. Economic and mathematical methods and models (microeconomics). Moscow: RUDN University; 2009. 282 p. (In Russ.).
10. Baranov A. Yu., Dolgopyatova T. G. Innovative behavior of firms and the business climate in countries with economies in transition. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal. 2012;10(4):3–30. (In Russ.).
11. Bagrinovskii K. A., Nikonova A. A. The competitive advantages of the Russian economy — the basis of its sustainable development. Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii = Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2015;(1):43–64. (In Russ.).
12. Safiulin A. R., Kotenkova S. N., Noven’kova A. Z. The role of industrial policy in the conditions of intensive development of the competitive advantages of the territory. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie nauki = St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics. 2016;(1):134–146. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.5862/JE.235.13
13. Babkin A. V., Moshkov A. A. Management of innovative potential of integrated industrial structures. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta ekonomiki i finansov. 2013;(6):45–53. (In Russ.).
14. Hausmann R., Hwang J., Rodrik D. What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth. 2007;12(1):1–25. DOI: 10.1007/s10887–006–9009–4
15. Cherif R., Hasanov F., Wang L. Sharp instrument: A stab at identifying the causes of economic growth. IMF Working Paper. 2018;(117). URL: https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/05/21/Sharp-Instrument-A-Stab-at-Identifying-the-Causes-of-Economic-Growth-45879 (accessed on 24.04.2019).
16. Kleinknecht A., van der Panne G. Who is right? Kuznets in 1930 or Schumpeter in 1939? In: Devezas T. C., ed. NATO Security through Science Series — E: Human and Societal Dynamics. Vol. 5: Kondratieff waves, warfare and world security. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2006:118–125.
17. Rodrik D. Normalizing industrial policy. Commission on Growth and Development. Working Paper. 2008;(3). URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/524281468326684286/pdf/577030NWP0Box31UBLIC 10gc1wp10031web.pdf (accessed on 24.04.2019).
18. Dezhina I. G., Ponomarev A. K. Promising production technologies: New emphasis in industrial development. Forsait = Foresight and STI Governance. 2014;8(2):16–29. (In Russ.).
19. Bogachev Yu.S., Rubval’ter D.A., Libkind A. N., Bogachev D. Yu., Libkind I. A., Vasil’eva L. V. Problems of choosing priority areas for the development of Russian science. Vlast’ = The Authority. 2014;(9):173–180. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Dontsova O.I., Abdikeev N.M., Bogachev Yu.S. The development of managerial mechanisms to ensure a technological breakthrough in the Russian economy. Management Sciences. 2019;9(4):15-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2019-9-4-15-31
Views:
785
Email this article 
