EFFECTIVENESS OF HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH IN INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT

Russia appeared in exclusively difficult situation today. The recently adopted Federal law of the Russian Federation “About the federal budget for 2015 and on planning period 2016 and 2017” is based that replenishment of the budget will be carried out at the expense of raw material resources, but not due to processing them. The calls facing economy of Russia form a basis of a new condition of transition to innovative economy. First of all, technological reindustrialization is necessary. The government accepted an anti-crisis plan, but among anti- recessionary measures there are no offers for the higher school. The only way for recovery from the crisis for Russia is the support on internal reserves and opportunities for quantitative and high-quality growth of economy. As one of such reserves in this paper the intellectual potential of the higher school and possibility of use of high school professor’s research as the equal partner of the state and business in the course of realization of model of “triple spiral”, in particular, higher education institutions possibility to force a technological background of the Russian economy is considered. The concept “higher education institution cluster” and (or)«higher education institution - an innovative hub of a cluster”, realized in Massachusetts Institute of Technology (USA) at creation of the Silicon Valley is considered as well. To provide effective use of creative potential of high school scientists in processes of transition to innovative economy classification of scientific and technological priorities by four groups is offered, the target priorities focused on achievement of the specific social and economic goals of Russia and its regions are provided in one of which. Ratings of innovative development of subjects of the Russian Federation are considered. Results of situation analysis of a social and economic condition of regions of placement of federal universities are given. It is offered to carry out improvement of systems of monitoring and the reporting accompanying innovative processes in the country.

transition to innovative economy, federal budget, technological background of economy, high school research, scientific priorities, ratings of regions

1. About forum. URL: http://www.fa.ru/Projects/ forum24/Pages/default.aspx (accessed: 21.01.2015) (in Russian).

2. Eskindarov M. A. Not to keep, but spend. URL: http://www.rg.ru/2014/10/17/ eskindarov-dz.html (accessed: 10.01.2015) (in Russian).

3. Russian Federation Federal Law of the 1st of December, 2014 “About the Federal budget for 2015 and plan period of 2016 and 2017” URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_ doc_LAW_171692/ (accessed: 10.01.2015) (in Russian).

4. A plan of urgent events in insurance the stable economic development and social strength in 2015.The Russian Federation Government Decree of 27th of January, 2015. URL: http://government.ru/info/761/ (accessed: 25.02.2015) (in Russian).

5. Primakov E. M. Optimistic crisis or crisis of optimism? URL: http://www.eg-online. ru/article/270604/ (accessed: 29.02.2015) (in Russian).

6. Anagebyan А. G. Russia social and economic situation and perspectives. The open lecture. The scientific conference «The managerial sciences in modern Russia» URL: http:// www.e-c-m.ru/magazine/81/ eau_81_253. htm (accessed: 17.02.2015) (in Russian).

7. The final report on the results of expert work in urgent problems of Russia social and economic strategy for the period till 2020. Moscow, 2013 (in Russian).

8. Itskovits G. The triple spiral. Universitiesenterprises-state. Innovations in action. Tomsk, 2010. 238 p. (in Russian).

9. Ngai-Ling Sum, Bob Jessop. Competitiveness, the Knowledge-Based Economy and Higher Education // Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2013. Vol. 4, Issue 1. P. 24–44 (in English).

10. Kuznetsov N. V., Shestak V. P. Uni as a development institute in real economic sector. Economica. Nalogi. Pravo. 2015, no. 2, pp. 21– 27 (in Russian).

11. Abdikeev N. M. Cognitive management. Upravlencheskie nauki, 2014, no. 3, pp. 71–78 (in Russian).

12. Innovative development ranking of the Russian Federation subjects. Moscow, 2014. 88 p. (in Russian).

13. Shestak V. P. Uni and innovative economy. Visheye obrazovaniye v Rosii, 2014, no. 11, pp 57–65 (in Russian).

14. Russian Federation President’s Decree of the 7th of May, 2008, No. 716 “About Federal universities”. URL: http://base.garant. ru/193234/ (accessed: 15.01. 2015) (in Russian).

15. Grinberg R. S., Sorokin D. E. The dangerous pessimism. URL: http://www. rg.ru/2014/01/24/ekonomika.html (accessed: 10.02.2015) (in Russian).

16. Ogorodova L. M. A speech at the expert session “The youth agenda: science priorities development in Russia” (Skolkovo, 11.09.2014). URL: http://минобрнауки. рф/новости/4437 (accessed: 15.01. 2015) (in Russian).

17. Shestak V. P., Vasilyeva L. V. Working out the system of markers and indicators of Russian Federation subjects social and economic development under the conditions of transition to innovative economy (the report on research activity).The report on state contract No. 01201464847, The Institute of innovative economy, Moscow, Finance University under the Government of the Russian Federation,, 2014. 271 p. (in Russian).