Gender Balance in Companies’ Management: The Effect on Financial Indicators

The purpose of this paper is to calculate the effect of gender balance in management on the economic performance of Russian companies. The relevance of the topic is explained by the fact that in Russia women make up almost 50% of the workforce (that exceeds the indicators of Western Europe and North America) and get a higher education on an equal basis with men, but women’s participation in the governing bodies of companies is insignificant (about 5%). This could result the companies losing the benefits of women’s human capital. The paper hypothesizes that Russian public joint stock companies with gender balanced governing bodies have better financial performance. An econometric model has been used to test this method. Data for the period of 9 years (from 2010 to 2018) for 44 non-financial companies whose shares were traded on the stock exchange during this period are taken. There has been applied Tobin’s Q as an indicator of the financial performance. Since there is a two-tier management system in public joint-stock companies in Russia. Two councils are considered as the governing bodies of the company — the supervisory board and the board of directors. The result of the study is the absence of a significant relationship between the gender balance in the governing bodies and the financial success of the companies. The main reasons for the lack of significant results include a special industry profile of Russian companies. The recommendation for the following studies is to focus not just on the firm’s financial performance but on the corporate and social impact of gender balance either.

1. Adams R. B., Ferrreira D. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics. 2009;94(2):291–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

2. Ahern K. R., Dittmar A. K. The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quartely Journal of Economics. 2012;127(1):137–197. DOI: 10.1093/qje/qjr049

3. Bohren O., Strom R. O. Governance and politics: Regulating independence and diversity in the board room. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2010;37(9–10):1281–1308. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–5957.2010.02222.x

4. Rose C. Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2007;15(2):404–413. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–8683.2007.00570.x

5. Wang Y., Clift B. Is there a “business case” for board diversity? Pacific Accounting Review. 2009;21(2):88–103. DOI: 10.1108/01140580911002044

6. Carter D. A., D’Souza F., Simkins B. J., Simpson W. G. The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2010;18(5):396–414. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–8683.2010.00809.x

7. Carter D. A., Simkins B. J., Simpson W. G. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review. 2003;38(1):33–53. DOI: 10.1111/1540–6288.00034

8. Campbell K., Mínguez-Vera A. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 2008;83(3):435–451. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–007–9630-y

9. Lückerath-Rovers M. Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance. 2013;17(2):491–509. DOI: 10.1007/s10997–011–9186–1

10. Reguera-Alvarado N., de Fuentes P., Laffarga J. Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics. 2015;141(2):337–350. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–015–2735–9

11. Sabatier M. A women’s boom in the boardroom: Effects on performance? Applied Economics. 2015;47(26):2717–2727. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2015.1008774

12. Vafaei A., Ahmed K., Mather P. Board diversity and financial performance in the Top 500 Australian firms. Australian Accounting Review. 2015;25(4):413–427. DOI: 10.1111/auar.12068

13. Li H., Chen P. Board gender diversity and firm performance: The moderating role of firm size. Business Ethics: A European Review. 2018;27(4):294–308. DOI: 10.1111/beer.12188

14. Julizaerma M. K., Sori Z. M. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance of Malaysian public listed companies. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012;65:1077–1085. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.374

15. Abdullah S. N., Ismail K. N., Nachum L. Does having women on boards create value? The impact of societal perceptions and corporate governance in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal. 2016;37(3):466–476. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2352

16. Nguyen T., Locke S., Reddy K. Does boardroom gender diversity matter? Evidence from a transitional economy. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2015;37:184–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2014.11.022

17. Low D. C.M., Roberts H., Whiting R. H. Board gender diversity and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong, South Korea, Malaysia and Singapore. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 2015;35(Pt. A):381–401. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2015.02.008

18. Gavrilov D. D., Ratnikova T. A. The impact of gender diversity of the board and ownership structure on corporate performance: Evidence from Western Europe. Ekonomicheskii zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki = The HSE Economic Journal. 2014;18(3):387–428. (In Russ.).

19. Berezinets I. V., Garanina T.A, Ilina Y. B. Social capital of women directors and financial performance of a company: Empirical study. Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta = Russian Management Journal. 2018;16(3):337–370. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.21638/spbu18.2018.302

20. Zahra S. A., Stanton W. W. The implications of board of directors composition for corporate strategy and performance. International Journal of Management. 1988;5(2):229–236.

21. Hillman A. J., Dalziel T. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. The Academy of Management Review. 2003;28(3):383–396. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2003.10196729

22. Miller T., Del Carmen Triana M. Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity — firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies. 2009;46(5):755–786. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–6486.2009.00839.x

23. Joshi A., Roh H. The role of context in work tram diversity research: A meta-analysis review. The Academy of Management Journal. 2009;52(3):599–628. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331491

24. Carpenter M. A. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal. 2002;23(3):275–284. DOI: 10.1002/smj.226

25. Coffey B. S., Wang J. Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics. 1998;17(14):1595–1603. DOI: 10.1023/A:1005748230228

26. Yi A. Mind the gap: Half of Asia’s boards have no women, a risky position for governance and growth. Auckland: The Korn/Ferry institute; 2011. 8 p. URL: https://www.kornferry.com/content/dam/kornferry/docs/article-migration/Mind%20the%20gap-%20Half%20of%20Asia%27s%20boards%20have%20no%20women,%20a%20risky%20position%20for%20governance%20and%20growth%20.pdf (accessed on 15.03.2020).

27. Singh V., Vinnicombe S. Why so few women directors in top UK boardrooms? Evidence and theoretical expectations. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2004;12(4):479–489. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–8683.2004.00388.x

28. Finegold D., Benson G. S., Hecht D. Corporate boards and company performance: Review of research in light of recent reforms. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2007;15(5):865–878. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–8683.2007.00602.x

29. Bear S., Rahman N., Post C. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics. 2010;97(2):207–221. DOI: 10.1007/s10551–010–0505–2

30. Huse M. Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management. 2005;16(S1): S65–S79. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–8551.2005.00448.x

31. Claes M.-T. Women, men and management styles. International Labour Review. 1999;138(4):431–446. DOI: 10.1111/j.1564–913X.1999.tb00396.x

32. Chung K. H., Pruitt S. W. A simple approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management. 1994;23(3):70–74. DOI: 10.2307/3665623

33. Kalabikhina I. E. Why it is important to develop institutions of gender equality in Russia. Nauchnye issledovaniya ekonomicheskogo fakul’teta. Elektronnyi zhurnal = Scientific Researches of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal. 2011;3(1):146–163. (In Russ.).