Knowledge management model based on organizational and motivational mechanisms
https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2021-11-2-85-98
Abstract
Knowledge management is among strategic tasks of a modern company. However, there is a gap in the literature considering the mechanisms of organizational knowledge intensification and its transformation into company competitiveness. The paper presents the knowledge management model based on the vector of proactive employee behavior, which is formed with the help of organizational and motivational mechanisms, including flexible organizational structure, transformational leadership, and a culture of knowledge. According to elaborated model proactive behavior of employees is oriented to knowledge intensification and active participation in the processes of organizational development and learning, which in turn determine innovation activities and financial performance of a company. The model has been tested using the database of 110 Russian companies that had been participated in the survey in 2019. Empirical results have been estimated in the software smartPLS using the method of structural equations and had confirmed the validity of elaborated knowledge management model. Obtained mediation effects allow making a conclusion about complementarity of the knowledge culture, transformational leadership and flexible organizational structure; therefore, these mechanisms should be implemented simultaneously for the successful transformation of knowledge into a company competitiveness. Also, the practical implication has an empirical evidence of the highest impact of transformational leadership on innovation and financial performance, determining this mechanism as a key one for Russian enterprises.
About the Authors
M. A. MolodchikRussian Federation
Mariya A. Molodchik, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Senior researcher at International Laboratory of Intangible-Driven Economy
Perm
I. A. Esaulova
Russian Federation
Irena A. Esaulova, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of Management and Marketing
Perm
A. V. Molodchik
Russian Federation
Anatolii V. Molodchik, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Head, Professor of the Department of Management and Marketing
Perm
References
1. Schumpeter J. A. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung: Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. München, Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot; 1911. 369 p. Schumpeter J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York, London: Harper & Brothers; 1942. 381 p. (Russ. ed.: Schumpeter J. Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm, demokratiya. Moscow: Eksmo; 2007. 861 p.).
2. Penrose E. T. The theory of the growth of the firm. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995. 272 p.
3. Drucker P. F. Landmarks of tomorrow: A report on the new “post-modern” world. New Brunswick, NJ; London: Transaction Publishers; 1996. 290 p.
4. Argyris C., Schön D.A. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1978. 344 p.
5. Heisig P. Harmonisation of knowledge management — comparing 160 KM frameworks around the globe. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2009;13(4):4–31. DOI: 10.1108/13673270910971798
6. Molodchik M. A. Organizational and motivational mechanisms of knowledge management: Theory and practice of Russian companies. Perm: Perm Nat. Res. Polytech. Univ.; 2017. 219 p. (In Russ.).
7. Shakina E. A., Barajas A., Molodchik M. Bridging the gap in competitiveness of Russian companies with intangible bricks. Measuring Business Excellence. 2017;21(1):86–100. DOI: 10.1108/MBE-03–2016–0017
8. Grant R. M. Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal. 1996;17(S 2):109– 122. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250171110
9. Molodchik A.V., Komarov S.V., Esaulova I.A., Dimitrakiev D. Mechanisms and forms of self-organization and self-development. Perm: Perm Nat. Res. Polytech. Univ.; 2019. 253 p. (In Russ.).
10. Stewart T. A. Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations. New York: Doubleday/Currency; 1997. 278 p. (Russ. ed.: Stewart T. A. Intellektual’nyi kapital. Novyi istochnik bogatstva organizatsii. Moscow: Pokolenie; 2007. 368 p.).
11. Adizes I. On the threshold of the managerial revolution. Harvard Business Review Rossiya. 2017;(1):11–15. URL: https://hbr-russia.ru/management/upravlenie-izmeneniyami/a18761 (accessed on 06.02.2021). (In Russ.).
12. Loseva O.V., Abdikeev N. M. System for evaluating organizational, human and consumer capital for effective management of intellectual capital of high-tech digital companies. Upravlencheskie nauki = Management Sciences in Russia. 2020;10(3):33–47. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2404–022X-2020–10–3–33–47
13. Molodchik M.A. Organization’s knowledge potential: Conceptual approach. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki = PNRPU Sociology and Economics Bulletin. 2020;(3):286–296. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15593/2224–9354/2020.3.21
14. Esaulova I., Semenova I. Personnel initiative management as an area of activity of a modern organization. Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya). 2017;(9):26–33. (In Russ.).
15. Pellegrini M. M., Ciampi F., Marzi G., Orlando B. The relationship between knowledge management and leadership: Mapping the field and providing future research avenues. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2020;24(6):1445–1492. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-01–2020–0034
16. Mahmoudsalehi M., Moradkhannejad R., Safari K. How knowledge management is affected by organizational structure. The Learning Organization. 2012;19(6):518–528. DOI: 10.1108/09696471211266974
17. Molodchik M., Jardon C. Facilitating organizational learning in the Russian business context. The Learning Organization. 2015;22(6):306–316. DOI: 10.1108/TLO-11–2014–0061
18. Aleksandrova Т., Popov V. Developing an organization’s corporate knowledge through action-based learning technologies. Upravlencheskie nauki = Management Sciences in Russia. 2020;10(1):68–80. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2404–022X-2020–10–1–68–80
19. Koveshnikov A., Ehrnrooth M., Wechtler H. The three graces of leadership: Untangling the relative importance and the mediating mechanisms of three leadership styles in Russia. Management and Organization Review. 2020;16(4):791–824. DOI: 10.1017/mor.2020.2
20. Shirokova G., Bogatyreva K., Beliaeva T. Entrepreneurial orientation of Russian firms: The role of external environment. Foresight and STI Governance. 2015;9(3):6–25. DOI: 10.17323/1995–459x.2015.3.6.25
21. Ringle C. M., Wende S., Becker J.-M. SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. 2015. URL: http://www.smartpls.com (accessed on 06.02.2021).
Review
For citations:
Molodchik M.A., Esaulova I.A., Molodchik A.V. Knowledge management model based on organizational and motivational mechanisms. Management Sciences. 2021;11(2):85-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2021-11-2-85-98