HARMONIZATION OF REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION MANAGEMENT STYLE
https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2016--1-26-42
Abstract
In the search for ways to further improve the effectiveness and efficiency of organizational management modern economic science is increasingly drawn to the psychological and sociological methods of integrating them into the overall management methodology. One of the most significant results of this integration is the concept of “management style”, which is absolutely clearly perceived at the level of the qualitative characteristics of organizational management, by causing different interpretations at the level of its quantitative measurement. This paper presents an approach to the measurement of leadership style, which is based on the theory of change management in the interpretation of Isaac Adizes. The key point of this theory is that the successful management of any economic system, its management must cope with four kinds of administrative activity: execution of (P),administration (A), entrepreneurship (E) and integration (I). If the management team no people capable of providing at least one type of control, the organization has managed to deal with unbalanced control, which cannot ensure its normal functioning.Based on this postulate the metric notion of «management style» and the rules for determining its value are discussed in the article. The applicability of this approach and the potential benefits of its use is demonstrated by measuring the leadership styles of key job positions hypothetical regional administrations to develop proposals for its improvement.
About the Author
I. Drogobitsky
Financial University
Russian Federation
Doctor in Economics, Professor, Department of System Analysis and Economic Processes Modeling
Russian Federation
Doctor in Economics, Professor, Department of System Analysis and Economic Processes Modeling
References
1. Adizes I. Idealny rukovoditel: pochemu im nel’zya stat’ i chto iz etogo sleduet [The ideal manager: why is it impossible to become it and what does it follow that?]. Moscow, Al’pina Biznes Buks — Alpina Business Books, 2007, 263 p. (in Russian).
2. Adizes I. Upravlyaya izmeneniyami [Managing innovations]. Saint Petersburg, Piter — Peter, 2008, 224 p. (in Russian).
3. Drogobitsky A. I. Korporativnoye upravleniye v znanievoy [Corporate management in knowledge economy]. Moscow, Ekonomika — Economics, 2008, 150 p. (in Russian).
4. Drogobitsky A. I. Sistemni analiz v ekonomike [System analysis in Economics]. Moscow, IUNITY-DANA — UNITY-DANA, 2011, 423 p. (in Russian).
5. Mintsberg G. Deistvui efektivno: lutshaya praktika menedzhmenta [Act effectively: the best management practice]. Saint Petersburg, Piter — Peter, 2001, 288 p. (in Russian).
6. Garaedagi J. Sistemnoye mishlenie: kak upravlyat’ khaosom I slozhnimi protsesami [System thinking: how to manage chaos and complicated processes]. Minsk, Grevtsov Publisher — Grevtsov Publisher, 2007, 480 p. (in Russian).
7. Drogobitsky A. I. Sistemnaya kibernitizatsiya organizatsionogo [System cybernation of organization management]. Moscow, Vuzovski uchebnik: INFRA-M — University textbook: INFRA-M, 2016, 333 p. (in Russian).
8. Shine E. Organizatsionaya kultura i liderstvo [Organization culture and leadership]. Saint Petersburg, Piter — Peter, 2007, 264 p. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Drogobitsky I. HARMONIZATION OF REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION MANAGEMENT STYLE. Management Sciences. 2016;6(1):26-42. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2016--1-26-42
Views:
582
Email this article 
