Preview

Management Sciences

Advanced search

Evolution of the Content of the Service Function of the Tax Authorities

https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2024-14-2-51-63

Abstract

The subject of the study is the activities of the Federal Tax Service (FTS of Russia), which annually strives to fulfil the objectives of not only increasing tax revenues to the budgets of the budgetary system of Russia, but also to improve the quality level of its activities. The key tool for the fulfillment of this goal for more than a decade remains digital technologies, allowing primarily for the improvement of tax control. Aim and objectives of the study. The analysis of the evolution of the development of technologies of control activity of tax authorities has led to the conclusion that strategically the control activity of the Federal Tax Service of Russia is increasingly built on the changing significance of other functions of tax authorities, among which the tax authority highlighted the service function. The article considers the foundations of the origin of the service function of tax authorities, transformation processes and development prospects taking into account new tools of interaction between tax authorities and taxpayers. At the same time, it touches upon the new services of the Federal Tax Service of Russia, as well as current directions of solving acute issues, in particular, the transition to EDI, the expansion of tax monitoring subjects, construction of a digital tax code, new tools for pre-trial consideration of tax disputes and minimization of tax risks. The study ultimately resulted in the construction of a scheme of the digital outline of the Russian tax system with the allocation of promising areas for further development.

About the Authors

L. I. Goncharenko
Financial University
Russian Federation

Lubov I. Goncharenko — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Professor of the Department of Taxes and Tax Administration; Department of Tax, Auditing and Business Analysis, Financial University.

Moscow



K. D. Krayushkin
DRT Tech LLC
Russian Federation

Kirill D. Krayushkin — master of Economics, leading consultant of the department of innovative IT solutions of the Department of Taxes and Law of DRT Tech LLC, DRT Tech LLC.

Moscow



References

1. Krasheninnikova M.A. We do not aim to weaken or minimize control over taxpayers. Our task is to control them effectively. Nalogoved = Nalogoved Journal. 2023;(11):15–30. (In Russ.).

2. Martini M.H. Introduction: An investigation of co-operative compliance regimes and the ICAP. In: Hein R., Russo R., eds. Co-operative compliance and the OECD’s International Compliance Assurance Programme. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International B.V.; 2020:1–15. (EUCOTAX Series on European Taxation. Vol. 68).

3. Martini M., Russo R., Pankov J.Y. Russia — An analysis of the Russian tax monitoring programme in light of the OECD concept of cooperative tax compliance and the experience of other countries. European Taxation. 2021;61(1):29–40. URL: https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/67527464/Russia_An_Analysis_of_the_Russian_Tax_Monitoring_Programme_IBFD.pdf

4. Shilova L.F., Ogorodnikova I.I. The institute of tax administration and the development of its tools in the conditions of the digital economy. Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki = Innovative Development of Economy. 2022;(6):206–209. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.51832/2223798420226206

5. Fotinov D.V., Dzhamurzaev Yu.D., Rodina O.V. Process and statistical approach in the activity of tax authorities. Nalogi i finansy. 2018;(1):7–24. (In Russ.).

6. Rudycheva N. How the AIS works on which the entire taxation system in Russia is functioning. CNews. Aug. 17, 2021. URL: https://www.cnews.ru/articles/2021–08–16_kak_ustroena_aisna_kotoroj_vystroena (accessed on 20.08.2023). (In Russ.).

7. Korotkova T. IBS will supply the “Kaspersky Lab” solution for the Federal Tax Service of Russia. CNews. Aug. 11, 2008. URL: https://www.cnews.ru/news/line/ibs_postavit_reshenie_laboratorii_kasperskogo (accessed on 21.03.2023). (In Russ.).

8. Alizar A. McAfee found antivirus on 83% of computers. Qrator. May 31, 2012. URL: https://xakep.ru/2012/05/31/58778/ (accessed on 13.03.2023). (In Russ.).

9. Zhdanova I. G. How to organize the process of joining tax monitoring. Nalogoved = Nalogoved Journal. 2023;(9):50–55. (In Russ.).

10. Kovalenko N.S., Leonov E.M. Tax monitoring: The 2021 results and prospects for development. Nalogoved = Nalogoved Journal. 2022;(1):34–41. (In Russ.).

11. Suvorova E.V. Feedback: How the Federal Tax Service works with the largest taxpayers. Nalogoved = Nalogoved Journal. 2022;(12):13–17. (In Russ.).

12. Kaplina M. S., Zhukova T.V. Tax monitoring — the digital revolution of the Russian tax system. Nauka i obrazovanie: khozyaistvo i ekonomika; predprinimatel’stvo; pravo i upravlenie. 2022;(9):7–15. (In Russ.).

13. Ochakovskiy V.A., Gritsai D.V., Balashov E.M. Tax monitoring: Problems and prospects of development. Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal = Eurasian Law Journal. 2022;(1):230–231. (In Russ.).

14. Advokatova A.S. Tax control in the context of modification of relations between tax authorities and taxpayers. Moscow: RuScience; 2020. 190 p. (In Russ.).

15. Yakushev R.V. Ways to reduce conflict in tax relations. Nalogoved = Nalogoved Journal. 2023;(6):56–59. (In Russ.).

16. Vinogradova O.A. Summoning a taxpayer outside a tax audit: What limits tax authorities’ powers? Nalogoved = Nalogoved Journal. 2023;(1):16–25. (In Russ.).

17. Krasnov M. Yu. Summoning a taxpayer to a commission: Pros and cons. Nalogoved = Nalogoved Journal. 2022;(12):48–59. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Goncharenko L.I., Krayushkin K.D. Evolution of the Content of the Service Function of the Tax Authorities. Management Sciences. 2024;14(2):51-63. https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2024-14-2-51-63

Views: 202


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2304-022X (Print)
ISSN 2618-9941 (Online)