The integrating role of digital staff maturity in a balanced digital transformation model.
https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2024-14-4-35-52
Abstract
The article is devoted to the theoretical and methodological substantiation of the integrating role of digital maturity of personnel in the processes of modern transformations of industrial enterprises. The subject of the study was the assessment of the role of company employees within the framework of the proposed balanced digital transformation (DT) model, and its purpose is to establish the relationship between the digital maturity (DM) of employees and methods of its formation, taking into account the priorities of a balanced DT. The methodological basis was the materials of works from the field of organizational institutionalism, applicable to solving the problems of managing digital transformations in industry. The results of the research, carried out using the methods of scientific analysis and synthesis, as well as processing the results of the survey and questionnaires, consist in the formation of new ideas about the model of digital transformation. The article reflects its features such as cyclical nature, the sequence of mandatory stages (formation of corporate digital culture, motivation of staff, practice-oriented mentoring, technology, data analysis and customer influence). As differences from existing approaches, the inclusion of the integrating role of digital maturity of personnel in the digital transformation (DT) processes and consideration of technologies and customer needs only after assessing the readiness of personnel in the formed digital environment is noted. The authors have formed recommendations for the practical implementation of the presented model of balanced digital transformation and the conduct of appropriate survey procedures that may be of interest to specialists in this field.
Keywords
About the Authors
I. M. StepnovRussian Federation
Igor M. Stepnov — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Prof. at the Department of Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance
M. Yu. Telegina
Russian Federation
Marina Yu. Telegina — consultant, research assistant
References
1. Dekhanova N. G., Sushko V. A., Kholodenko Yu.A. Russia: The socio-economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sotsiologiya = Sociology. 2022;(2):120–133. (In Russ.).
2. Gobozov I. A. Digitalization of society and deintellectualization of a person. Filosofiya i obshchestvo = Philosophy and Society. 2021;(3):35–54. (In Russ.).
3. Ermolaeva Yu. V. Green jobs and COVID-19 challenges around the world. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovation & Investment. 2020;(10):34–40. (In Russ.).
4. Gaifullin E. O. Artificial intelligence in medicine. Ceteris Paribus. 2023;(5):118–122. (In Russ.).
5. Mukhamadieva K. B. Artificial intelligence in the development of youth. Obrazovanie i problemy razvitiya obshchestva = Education and Problems of Development of Society. 2021;(2):27–33. (In Russ.).
6. Koshlyak A. D. Directions of application of artificial intelligence in modern psychodiagnostics. In: Psychology in the space of education and personal development: Promising practices of scientific research and cooperation. Kaluga: Kaluga State University named after K. E. Tsiolkovsky; 2024:197–201. (In Russ.).
7. Graeber D. Bullshit jobs: A theory. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster; 2018. 368 p. (Russ. ed.: Graeber D.Bredovaya rabota. Traktat o rasprostranenii bessmyslennogo truda. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press; 2020. 420 p.).
8. Gerth T., Peppard J. How new leaders “fit in”. In: Taking the reins as CIO: A blueprint for leadership transitions. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2020:43–59. DOI: 0.1007/978–3–030–31953–3_3
9. Alekseev K. N. The impact of the role of CDO on the digital transformation of business. In: The global economy in the 21st century: The role of biotechnology and digital technologies. Moscow: Konvert; 2020:54–56. (In Russ.).
10. Osovitskaya N. HR DIGITAL: Best employers practices. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2022. 533 p. (In Russ.).
11. Akivaeva S. E., Kuchkovskaya N. V. Risks and opportunities of digital transformation for business. Uspekhi v khimii i khimicheskoi tekhnologii. 2023;37(1):6–9. (In Russ.).
12. Shevchuk A. Theorizing digital platforms: A conceptual framework for the gig economy. Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya = Economic Sociology. 2023;24(5):11–53. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1726–3247–2023–5–11–53
13. Greenwood R., Oliver C., Sahlin K., Suddaby R., eds. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2008. 840 p. DOI: 10.4135/9781849200387
14. Greenwood R., Oliver C., Lawrence T.B., Meyer R. E., eds. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2017. 928 р. DOI: 10.4135/9781526415066
15. Tambovtsev V. What can institutes do? Metaphors of the organizational institutionalism. Voprosy teoreticheskoi ekonomiki = Theoretical Economics. 2022;(2):22–38. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52342/2587–7666VTE_2022_2_22_38
16. Nikitina D. Pointless labor, bullshit jobs, and organizational absurdity: New directions for institutional theory. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie = Russian Sociological Review. 2023;22(1):129–146. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1728–192x-2023–1–129–146
17. Frolov D. P. The future of pluralistic institutional theory. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2022;(4):45–69. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2022–4–45–69
18. Khorolceva E. B., Fedorova A. V. Risks of paradigm turns in the research of modern organizations. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya = Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration. 2022;22(2):83–94. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/1682–2358–2022–2–83–94
19. Tambovtsev V. Institutional complexity: Is it a new direction for institutional research? Voprosy teoreticheskoi ekonomiki = Theoretical Economics. 2023;(2):22–34. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.52342/2587–7666VTE_2023_2_22_34
20. Stepnov I. M., Kovalchuk J. A. Business ecosystem finance: Modern agenda and challenges. Finance: Theory and Practice. 2023;27(6):89–100. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2587–5671–2023–27–6–89–100
21. Bresciani S., Huarng K.-H., Malhotra A., Ferraris A. Digital transformation as a springboard for product, process and business model innovation. Journal of Business Research. 2021;128:204–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.02.003
22. Stefanova K., Kabakchieva D. Challenges and perspectives of digital transformation. In: Proc. Int. conf. “Information and communication technologies in business and education”. Varna: Science and Economics; 2019:13–23.
23. Abramov I. V. Conceptual model of digital transformation of manufacturing enterprises. Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya = Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2023;(8):176–181. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24158/tipor.2023.8.21
24. Nogovitsyn M. A. Approaches to developing a digital transformation model for the Russian economy in the context of global challenges. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2023;29(1):101–114. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/1998–1627–2023–1–101–114
25. Volchik V., Panteeva S. Improving the Russian innovation system: combining model and narrative-based approaches. Mir Rossii. Sotsiologiya. Etnologiya = Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology. 2024;33(1):163–186. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1811–038X-2024–33–1–163–186
26. Schein E. H. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1992. 464 p. (Russ. ed.: Schein E H. Organizatsionnaya kul’tura i liderstvo. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2002. 336 p.).
27. Senge P. M. The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York, London: Doubleday Business; 1994. 448 p. (Russ. ed.: Senge P. Pyataya distsiplina: iskusstvo i praktika obuchayushcheisya organizatsii. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2018. 524 p.).
28. Katzenbach J. R., Thomas J., Anderson G. The critical few: Energize your company’s culture by choosing what really matters. Oakland, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.; 2019. 208 p. . (Russ. ed.: Katzenbach J., Thomas J., Anderson G. Transformatsiya korporativnoi kul’tury: Vazhnye detali, bez kotorykh nichego ne rabotaet. Moscow: Intellektual’naya Literatura; 2020. 202 p.).
29. McAfee A., Brynjolfsson E. Machine, platform, crowd: Harnessing our digital future. New York, London: W. W. Norton & Co.; 2017. 416 p. (Russ. ed.: McAfee A., Brynjolfsson E. Mashina, platforma, tolpa. Nashe tsifrovoe budushchee. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2019. 476 p.).
30. Porter M. E. On competition. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1998. 485 p. (Russ. ed.: Porter M. Konkurentsiya. Moscow: Williams; 2010. 592 p.).
31. Kotter J. P. Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press; 1996. 187 p. (Russ. ed.: Kotter J. Vperedi peremen: Kak uspeshno provesti organizatsionnye preobrazovaniya. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2019. 288 p.).
32. Collins J. Good to great: Why some companies make the leap… and others don’t. New York, NY: HarperBusiness; 2001. 310 p. (Russ. ed.: Collins J. Ot khoroshego k velikomu: pochemu odni kompanii sovershayut proryv, a drugie net… Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2011. 305 p.).
33. Davenport T. H., Kim J. Keeping up with the quants: Your guide to understanding and using analytics. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press; 2013. 240 p. (Russ. ed.: Davenport T., Ho K.J. O chem govoryat tsifry. Kak ponimat’ i ispol’zovat’ dannye. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber 2014. 280 p.).
34. Hamel G., with Breen B. The future of management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press; 2007. 288 p. (Russ. ed.: Hamel G., Breen B. Budushchee menedzhmenta. St. Petersburg: BestBusinessBooks; 2013. 276 p.).
35. Mayer-Schönberger V., Cukier K. Big Data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. Boston, MA: Eamon Dolan Books/Mariner Books; 2014. 272 p. (Russ. ed.: Mayer-Schönberger V., Cukier K. Bol’shie dannye. Revolyutsiya, kotoraya izmenit to, kak my zhivem, rabotaem i myslim. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, 2014. 310 p.).
Review
For citations:
Stepnov I.M., Telegina M.Yu. The integrating role of digital staff maturity in a balanced digital transformation model. Management Sciences. 2024;14(4):35-52. https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2024-14-4-35-52