Methodology for managing employee performance in modern commercial organizations.
https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2024-14-4-91-107
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to create a method for managing the productivity of employees of a commercial organization and assess its potential effectiveness through theoretical modeling of the result. The principle of the method is based on the iterative redistribution or reallocation of the employees among the company’s departments or structural units taking into account the current and potential changes in order to increase their labor productivity. Modelling analysis was performed using the retrospective data of the commercial organization — the period under consideration was equal to 39 months. The calculation assessed the dependence of changes on two indicators that noticeably affect the results: the number of cities where the company is present and the number of positions available in the company; it also determined the likely effect of the increase in labour productivity of employees when using the method. The influence of quantity of job positions and cities where company operates on the final result was also determined. The modeling carried out allows to draw a conclusion about the potential effectiveness of this approach, especially for organizations with one or in the same location and/or employing a large number of people performing similar functions, as it does not require significant financial outlays. The content and the results of the work presented in the article will be of interest to both HR practitioners and representatives of the scientific sphere.
About the Author
A. T. Samatoev
Polyus (company)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Artem T. Samatoev — Organizational design expert
References
1. Joseph J., Gaba V. Organizational structure, information processing, and decision-making: A retrospective and road map for research. Academy of Management Annals. 2020;14(1):267–302. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2017.0103
2. Rajala T., Kokko P. Biased by design — the case of horizontal accountability in a hybrid organization. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. 2022;35(3):830–862. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-11–2019–4272
3. Hanelt A., Bohnsack R., Marz D., Antunes Marante C. A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: Insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies. 2021;58(5):1159–1197. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12639
4. Mustafa G., Solli-Sæther H., Bodolica V., et al. Digitalization trends and organizational structure: Bureaucracy, ambidexterity or post-bureaucracy? Eurasian Business Review. 2022;12(4):671–694. DOI: 10.1007/s40821–021–00196–8
5. Foss N. J. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on firms’ organizational designs. Journal of Management Studies. 2021;58(1):270–274. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12643
6. Salcinovic B., Drew M., Dijkstra P., et al. Factors influencing team performance: What can support teams in high-performance sport learn from other industries? A systematic scoping review. Sports Medicine-Open. 2022;8(1):25. DOI: 10.1186/s40798–021–00406–7
7. Adula M., Kant S., Birbirsa Z. A. Systematic literature review on human resource management effect on organization performance. Annals of Human Resource Management Research. 2022;2(2):131–146. DOI: 10.35912/ahrmr.v2i2.1418
8. Roczniewska M., Smoktunowicz E., Calcagni C. C., et al. Beyond the individual: A systematic review of the effects of unit-level demands and resources on employee productivity, health, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2022;27(2):240–257. DOI: 10.1037/ocp0000311
9. Glikson E., Woolley A. W. Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals. 2020;14(2):627–660. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2018.0057
10. Larson L., DeChurch L. A. Leading teams in the digital age: Four perspectives on technology and what they mean for leading teams. The Leadership Quarterly. 2020;31(1):101377. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101377
11. McNeese M.D., McNeese N. J. Humans interacting with intelligent machines: At the crossroads of symbiotic teamwork. In: Pak R., de Visser E. J., Rovira E., eds. Living with robots: Emerging issues on the psychological and social implications of robotics. London: Academic Press; 2020:165–197. DOI: 10.1016/B 978–0–12–815367–3.00009–8
12. O’Neill T., McNeese N., Barron A., Schelble B. Human-autonomy teaming: A review and analysis of the empirical literature. Human Factors. 2022;64(5):904–938. DOI: 10.1177/0018720820960865
13. Myers C., Ball J. Cooke N., et al. Autonomous intelligent agents for team training. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2018;34(2):3–14. DOI: 10.1109/MIS.2018.2886670
14. Sleiman A. A., Sigurjonsdottir S., Elnes A., et al. A quantitative review of performance feedback in organizational settings (1998–2018). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. 2020;40(3–4):303–332. DOI: 10.1080/01608061.2020.1823300
15. Ridwan M., Mulyani S. R., Ali H. Improving employee performance through perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy. 2020;11(12):839–849. DOI: 10.31838/SRP.2020.12.123
16. Arimie J. C., Oronsaye A. O. Assessing employee relations and organizational performance: A literature review. International Journal of Applied Research in Business and Management. 2020;1(1):1–17. DOI: 10.51137/ijarbm.2020.1.1.1
17. Саматоев А. Т., Лапидус Л. В., Полякова Ю. М. Анализ детерминант выполнения ключевых показателей эффективности сотрудников в современных условиях. Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: Экономика и управление. 2024;(3):76–97. DOI: 10.17308/econ.2024.3/12284 Samatoev A. T., Lapidus L.V., Polyakova Yu. M. Analysis of the determinants of the employees key performance indicators implementation in modern conditions. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i upravlenie = Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Economy and Management. 2024;(3):76–97. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17308/econ.2024.3/12284
Review
For citations:
Samatoev A.T. Methodology for managing employee performance in modern commercial organizations. Management Sciences. 2024;14(4):91-107. https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2024-14-4-91-107
Views:
167
Email this article 
