Methodological tools of consulting companies for evaluating the effectiveness of organizations.

Abstract

The article is devoted to a comparative analysis of existing opportunities and directions for evaluating the effectiveness  of organizations using the resource-cost method (static model), Pareto optimality and the dynamic standard method (dynamic model). The purpose of the study was to identify the content of alternative approaches and models used by consulting companies to determine the effectiveness of organizations that produce and sell goods and services. The methodology described in the article is based on neoclassical economic theory. In the course of the work, a conceptual analysis of significant scientific alternatives to static and dynamic models for assessing economic efficiency was carried out. Any of them (or a combination of them), as established by the authors of the study, can be equally applied in the activities of all economic entities, including consulting companies. The results obtained include the definition of a set of  methodological tools within the framework of the resource-cost method, the Paretian optimum and the dynamic standard  method; substantiation of the equivalence and mutual complementarity of scientific model alternatives to efficiency, the interaction of the process and the result of efficiency assessment based on the principle of complementarity; evaluation  of the organization’s activities in a static efficiency model as an example of the implementation of the principle of  complementarity. The results of the study can be applied both in the practice of management consulting and regular management of the organization.