A New Management Paradigm in the Digital Economy

The aim of this study was to identify the key focal points in the formation of a new management paradigm amid the exponential growth of digital technologies and the digital economy. The primary objectives included determining the conditions, development directions, levels, and contradictions of the emerging paradigm. This research employed general scientific methods such as analysis, synthesis, and grouping. A review of existing theoretical and practical studies on new management principles and managerial thinking was conducted, using a rhizomatic approach to identify trends and connections, as well as alternative structuring through a development matrix based on various focal points. The study revealed that development trends are multidirectional, societal changes occur asynchronously and in a differentiated manner, and their effects can be both positive and negative. In an era of high turbulence and exponential growth, localized patterns and models emerge instead of universally accepted ones, making flexible management and systems thinkingcrucial. The findings suggest that rather than establishing a rigid management paradigm, decision-makers at all levels should navigate a turbulent environment by employing different focal points. The proposed management development matrix serves as a tool for fostering systemic thinking among leaders, allowing them to consider existing contradictions and prioritize values. The scientific novelty of this study lies in the application of contemporary approaches for systematizing current trends, drawing on post-structuralist philosophy and alternative cognitive tools. These results may be useful for managers at all levels, professionals in corporate development sectors, government administration, and researchers.

1. North D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. 159 p. (Russ. ed.: North D. Instituty, institutsional’nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki. Moscow: Nachala; 1997. 180 p.).

2. Markova V. D., Kuznetsova S.A Digital economy development management: Analytical review. Mir ekonomiki i upravleniya = World of Economics and Management. 2020;20(3):166–183. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-3-166-183

3. Drucker P.F. Management challenges for the 21st century. New York, NY: HarperBusiness; 2001. 224 p. (Russ. ed.: Drucker P.F. Menedzhment. Vyzovy XXI veka. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2012. 235 p.).

4. Lapidus L.V. The digital economy challenges as the digital transformation triggers: Evolutionary scale and the cause-and-effect relationships. Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii = Intellect. Innovation. Investments. 2023;(3):11–27. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25198/2077-7175-2023-3-11

5. Cheremnykh V. Yu., Yakovlev L. S. A new paradigm of managerial thinking in the development of the digital economy. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniya = Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration. 2019;19(2):4–13. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/1682-2358-2019-2-4-13

6. Kokorev A. S. The digital economy: Changing values and guidelines in enterprise management. Moskovskii ekonomicheskii zhurnal = Moscow Economic Journal. 2019;(1):252–259. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24411/2413-046X-2019-11028

7. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Rhizome. In: Capitalisme et schizophrénie: Mille plateaux. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit; 1980:9–38. (Russ. ed.: Deleuze G., Guattari F. Ch. 1. Rizoma. Tysyacha plato. Al’manakh “Vostok”. 2005;(11–12). URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20180929012423/http://www.situation.ru/app/j_art_1023.htm).

8. Nureev R. M., Kаrapaev O. V. Economy digitalization under the wave nature of innovation development. Upravlencheskie nauki = Management Sciences in Russia. 2020;10(1):36–54. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26794/2404-022X-2020-10-1-36-54

9. Sadovaya E. S. Digital economy and a new paradigm of the labor market. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya = World Economy and International Relations. 2018;62(12):35–45. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-12-35-45

10. Chang E., West M. Digital ecosystems: A next generation of the collaborative environment. In: 8th Int. conf. on information integration and web-based applications services — iiWAS’2006 (Yogyakarta, December 4–6, 2006). Yogyakarta: University Atma Jaya Yogyakarta; 2006:3–23. URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=3d08bad6a7d379a049639eb28440a42fdd5af704

11. Vogel J., Hickel J. Is green growth happening? An empirical analysis of achieved versus Paris-compliant CO2-GDP decoupling in high-income countries. The Lancet Planetary Health. 2023;7(9): e759-e769. DOI: 10.1016/s2542-5196(23)00174-2

12. Glaser V. L., Sloan J., Gehman J. Organizations as algorithms: A new metaphor for advancing management theory. Journal of Management Studies. 2024;61(6):2748–2769. DOI: 10.1111/joms.13033

13. Styazhkina E.I. Formation of new management approaches based on current vectors of personal and organizational development. Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sociologii. = The review of economy, the law and sociology. 2023; (4): 114–117. (In Russ.).

14. Mau V. A. The economy of the unpredictable: On the way to a new paradigm. Obrazovatel’naya politika = Educational Policy. 2020; (1): 8–11. (In Russ.).

15. Stark D., Pais I. Algorithmic management in the platform economy. Ekonomicheskaya sociologiya = Economic Sociology. 2021;22(3):71–103. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1726-3247-2021-3-71-103

16. Slavnov S. Base and superstructure in the digital age. Rabkor. 2021. URL: https://rabkor.ru/columns/analysis/2021/10/20/basis_and_superstructure_in_the_digital_age/ (In Russ.).

17. Mason A., Lee R., Jiang J. X. Demographic dividends, human capital, and saving. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing. 2016;7:106–122. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2016.02.004/

18. Aguilera R.V., De Massis A., Fini R., Vismara S.Organizational goals, outcomes, and the assessment of performance: Reconceptualizing success in management studies. Journal of Management Studies. 2024;61(1):1–36. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12994

19. Antonov V., Samosudov M. Problems and prospects of digital management development. E-Management. 2018;1(2):38–48. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26425/2658-3445-2018-2-38-48

20. Lychkina N. Innovative paradigms of simulation modeling and their application in the field of management consulting, logistics and strategic management. Logistika i upravlenie tsepyami postavok = Logistics and Supply Chain Management. 2013;(5):28–41. (In Russ.).

21. Ilyas I. M., Kammerlander N., Turturea R., van Essen M. When business model innovation creates value for companies: A meta-analysis on institutional contingencies.Journal of Management Studies. 2024;61(5):1825–1883. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12966

22. Levin B., Downes L. Who is going to regulate AI? Harvard Business Review. May 19, 2023. URL: https://hbr.org/2023/05/who-is-going-to-regulate-ai

23. Mezhevov A. D., Zheltenkov A.V., Ryabichenko S.A. New management requirements in an accelerating changing external environment. Vestnik universiteta (Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya). 2022;(11):71–76. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.26425/1816-4277-2022-11-71-76

24. Gadasina L. V., Piven G. I. Is digitalization a threat or an opportunity for management development? Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki = Russian Journal of Innovation Economics. 2018;8(4):565–574. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/vinec.8.4.39491

25. Digilina O. B., Teslenko I. B. Transformation of the labor market in the context of digitalization Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo = RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Economics. Management. Law. 2019;(4– 2):166–181. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.28995/2073-6304-2019-4-166-180

26. Clark D., Chamorro-Premuzic T. 5 Ways to future-proof your career in the age of AI. Harvard Business Review. April 25, 2023. URL: https://hbr.org/2023/04/5-ways-to-future-proof-your-career-in-the-age-of-ai