Подходы к лидерству в промышленных организациях, находящихся в государственной собственности: опыт развивающейся страны

Цель данной работы состоит в изучении стилей руководства, как уже применяющихся, так и еще не проверенных на практике управленческим персоналом промышленных организаций Бангладеш, находящихся в государственной собственности. В исследовании приняли участие 60 специально отобранных руководящих сотрудников трех различных предприятий. Они должны были ответить на 20 вопросов анкеты, составленной ученым-бихевиористом. Для анализа полученных данных использовалось программное обеспечение SPSS. Результаты показали, что контроль над принятием решений понимается респондентами не совсем так, как это описано в теоретических источниках. Выяснилось, что на такие процессы, как выработка политики подразделения в отношении организации работников, определение приемов и методов работы отдела, распределение обязанностей между подчиненными, участие в деятельности подчиненных и поддержание дисциплины, управленческий персонал практически не влияет — его действия полностью подчинены стандартам и процедурам, установленным в компании. При этом участники опроса, конечно, хотели бы иметь возможность оказывать бо́льшее влияние на принятие решений во всех областях.

1. Yang C.-X., Liu H.-M., Wang X.-X. Organization theories: From classical to modern. Journal of Applied Sciences. 2013;13:4470–4476. DOI: 10.3923/jas.2013.4470.4476

2. Zhang J., Wang Y., Gao F. The dark and bright side of laissez-faire leadership: Does subordinates’ goal orientation make a difference? Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14:1077357. DOI: 10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2023.1077357

3. Breevaart K., Zacher H. Main and interactive effects of weekly transformational and laissez-faire leadership on followers’ trust in the leader and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2019;92(2):384–409. DOI: 10.1111/joop.12253

4. Chi N.-W., Lam L. W. Is negative group affective tone always bad for team creativity? Team trait learning goal orientation as the boundary condition. Group & Organization Management. 2022;47(1):72–108. DOI: 10.1177/10596011211011336

5. Diebig M., Bormann K. C. The dynamic relationship between laissez-faire leadership and day-level stress: A role theory perspective. German Journal of Human Resource Management . 2020;34(3):324–344. DOI: 10.1177/2397002219900177

6. Fiaz M., Su Q., Ikram A., Saqib A. Leadership styles and employees’ motivation: Perspective from an emerging economy. The Journal of Developing Areas. 2017;51(4):143–156. DOI: 10.1353/jda.2017.0093

7. Bass B. M., Bass R. The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. New York, NY: Free Press; 2009. 1536 p.

8. Barnes C. M., Lucianetti L., Bhave D. P., Christian M. S. You wouldn’t like me when I’m sleepy: Leader sleep, daily abusive supervision, and work unit engagement. Academy of Management Journal. 2015;58(5):14191437. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2013.1063

9. Bass B. M., Avolio B. J. Multifactor leadership questionnaire for research: Rater form. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden, Inc.; 1994.

10. Judge T. A., Piccolo R. F. Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2014;89(5):755–768. DOI: 10.1037/0021–9010.89.5.755

11. Hinkin T. R., Schriesheim C. A. An examination of “nonleadership”: From laissez-faire leadership to leader re ward omission and punishment omission. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008;93(6):1234–1248. DOI: 10.1037/a0012875

12. Ilyas S., Abid G., Ashfaq F. Ethical leadership in sustainable organizations: The moderating role of general self-efficacy and the mediating role of organizational trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2020;22:195–204. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.03.003

13. Zhang X., Bartol K. M. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal. 2010;53(1):107–128. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2010.48037118

14. Kerr S., Jermier J. M. Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1978;22(3):375–403. DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90023–5

15. Mondy R. W., Premeaux R. S. Management: Concept, practice and skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1995. 721 p.

16. Frischer J., Larsson K. Laissez-faire in research education — an inquiry into a Swedish doctoral program. High er Education Policy. 2000;13(2):131–155. DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8733(99)00022-7

17. Baucus M. S., Beck-Dudley C. L. Designing ethical organizations: Avoiding the long-term negative effects of rewards and punishments. Journal of Business Ethics. 2005;56(4):355–370. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-004-1033-8

18. Eagly A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt M.C., Van Engen M. L. Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin. 2003;129(4):569–591. DOI: 10.1037/0033–2909.129.4.569

19. Krieg T. R. Effective school leadership mentoring characteristics in the 21 st century: Moving beyond compliance and conformity. PhD dissertation. Terre Haute, IN: Indiana State University; 2021. 242 p. URL: https://scholars.indianastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2926&context=etds

20. Khan M. S., Khan I., Qureshi Q. A. The styles of leadership: A critical review. Public Policy and Administration Research. 2015;5(3):87–92. URL: https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/PPAR/article/viewFile/20878/21131

21. Biloa X. V. The impact of leadership style on employee job performance. Open Journal of Leadership. 2023;12(4):418–441. DOI: 10.4236/ojl.2023.124020

22. Van Wart M. Dynamics of leadership in public service: Theory and practice. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe; 2005. 499 p.

23. Currivan D. B. The causal order of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in models of employee turnover. Human Resource Management Review. 1999;9(4):495–524. DOI: 10.1016/S1053–4822(99)00031–5

24. Mount M., Ilies R., Johnson E. Relationship of personality traits and counter productive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology. 2006;59(3):591–622. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744–6570.2006.00048.x

25. Spector P. E. Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2000. 480 p.

26. Reyes P., Shin H. S. Teacher commitment and job satisfaction: A causal analysis. Journal of School Leadership. 1995;5(1):22–39. DOI: 10.1177/105268469500500102

27. Shan M. H. Professional commitment and satisfaction among teachers in urban middle schools. The Journal of Educational Research. 1998;92(2):67–73. DOI: 10.1080/00220679809597578

28. Testa M. R. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and effort in the service environment. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied. 2001;135(2):226–236. DOI: 10.1080/00223980109603693

29. Rai A., Budhathoki P. B., Rai C. K. Linkage between job satisfaction, democratic leadership style and the organizational commitment of employees of privates of bank in Nepal. Researcher: A Research Journal of Culture and Society. 2020;4(1):97–111. DOI: 10.3126/researcher.v4i1.33814

30. Rapp A., Ahearne M., Mathieu J. E., Schillewaert N. The impact of knowledge and empowerment on working smart and working hard: The moderating role of experience. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2006;23(3):279–293. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.02.003

31. Krishnan B., Netemeyer R., Boles J. Self-efficacy, competitiveness, and effort as antecedents of sales person performance. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management. 2002;22(4):285–295. DOI: 10.1080/08853134.2002.10754315

32. Dawson L. L. The study of new religious movements and the radicalization of home-grown terrorists: Opening a dialogue. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2009;22(1):1–21. DOI: 10.1080/09546550903409163

33. Dubrin A. J., Dalglish C., Miller P. Leadership. 2 nd Asia-Pacific ed. Milton: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd; 2006. 511 p.

34. Jooste C. J., Fourie B. J. The role of strategic leadership in effective strategy implementation: Perceptions of South African strategic leaders. Southern African Business Review. 2009;13(3):51–68. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228435825_The_role_of_strategic_leadership_in_effective_strategy_implementation_Perceptions_of_South_African_strategic_leaders

35. Germano M. A. Leadership style and organizational impact. Library Worklife. 2010;7(6):39–48. URL: https://ala-apa.org/newsletter/2010/06/08/spotlight

36. Ojokuku R. M., Odetayo T. A., Sajuyigbe A. S. Impact of leadership style on organizational performance: A case study of Nigerian banks. American Journal of Business and Management . 2012;1(4):202–207. DOI: 10.11634/216796061706212

37. Sougui A. O. The influence of leadership styles on employees’ job performance through the mediation role of employees’ motivation and job satisfaction. PhD dissertation. Johor: Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia; 2017. 61 p. URL: http://eprints.uthm.edu.my/298/1/24p%20ALI%20OROZI%20SOUGUI.pdf

38. Huque A. S., Ferdous J. Bureaucratic and political leadership in Bangladesh: Dynamics of administra tive reform and the public interest. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration. 2019;41(3):169–180. DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2019.1658364

39. Hyslop-Margison E.J., Leonard H. A. Post neo-liberalism and the humanities: What the repressive state ap paratus means for universities. Canadian Journal of Higher Education. 2012;42(2):1–12. DOI: 10.47678/cjhe.v42i2.183579

40. Berkowitz D., Krause G. A. How bureaucratic leadership shapes policy outcomes: Partisan politics and affluent citizens’ incomes in the American states. Journal of Public Policy. 2018;40(2):305–328. DOI: 10.1017/S0143814X18000405

41. Lumby J. Distributed leadership and bureaucracy. Educational Management Administration & Leadership . 2019;47(1):5–19. DOI: 10.1177/1741143217711190

42. Zikmund W. G., Babin J. B., Carr C. J., Griffin M. Business research methods. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning; 2014. 696 p.

43. Haque A., Fernando M., Caputi P. How is responsible leadership related to the three-component mod el of organisational commitment? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2021;70(5):1137–1161. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-10-2019-0486

44. Burns A. C., Bush R. F. Marketing research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2006. 680 p.

45. Ali M., Ullah M. S. Role of laissez-faire leadership in talent management: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry of Bangladesh. Heliyon. 2023;9(6): e17234. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17234