Methodological Approaches to Creation and Organization of Functioning of a Federal Risk Management System

The paper provides a methodological and methodical study of creation of a federal risk management system in the sphere of economics at the federal level (further - FRMS) provided for in a number of normative and concept selection documents recently accepted in the Russian Federation in order to organize and a regulate the activities for ensuring economic security of the Russian Federation. The study offers an evidence-based methodological basis for the creation of the FRMS with the use of modern approaches to the analysis of complex organizational systems. The research takes a system and vital methodological approaches and is based on the theory of development, the theory of management, and risk management practices of economic entities. The study states the methodological approach to the creation and functioning of the FRMS in concordance with “The strategy of economic security of the Russian Federation until 2030”. The authors identify the main characteristics of a national risk management system which features a higher level of complexity as compared to a corporation, a variety of terms and factors of existence and development, and a wider range of challenges, threats and risks as well as objectives and thus a wider range of operational values, criteria and sustainable development and efficiency indicators. The paper provides the bases for the realization of the purposes and functions of the FRMS and details its objectives. The article describes the methodological platform of the FRMS formation. The realization of the suggested methodology requires the involvement of subject matter specialists in various areas of knowledge and design - social systems, institutional approach to social and economic management, modeling of social objects, organizational systems, information and conceptual modeling, macroeconomics, information technologies, cognitive science and expert systems. The realization of the system requires the development of a road map and standard legal support, particularly, the statutorization of tasks and functions of national and economic security provision in the local acts regulating the activity of FSRM subjects - public authorities.

1. Pobyvaev S. A., Selivanov A. I., Smirnov V. V., Starovoitov V. G., Troshin D. V. Monitoring of the state of economic security in the public administration of Russia: Modern theory and practice. Upravlencheskie nauki = Management Science. 2017;7(4):16-25. (In Russ.).

2. Vorob’ev S.N., Baldin K. V. Risk management in business. 4th ed. Moscow: Dashkov & Co. Publ.; 2013. 482 p. (In Russ.).

3. Vladimirov V. A., Vorob’ev Yu.L., Salov S. S. et al. Risk management: Risk. Sustainable development. Synergetrics. Moscow: Nauka; 2000. 431 p. (In Russ.).

4. Utkin E. A., Frolov D. A. Risk management of the enterprise. Moscow: TEIS Publ.; 2003. 247 p. (In Russ.).

5. Hubbard D. W. The failure of risk management: Why it’s broken and how to fix it. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2009. 304 р.

6. Hillson D., Simon P. Practical project risk management: The ATOM methodology. 2nd ed. Tysons Corner, VA: Management Concepts Press; 2012. 250 р.

7. Best practice in risk management: A function comes of age. A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit. London: Economist Intelligence Unit; 2007. 24 р. URL: http://graphics.eiu.com/files/ad_pdfs/eiu_Risk_Management.pdf

8. Crouhy M., Galai D., Mark R. The essentials of risk management. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2013. 641 p.

9. Kononov D. A., Ponomarev N. O., Ponomarev R. O., Barbashev M. P. Regional systems: Modeling of the crisis phenomena and vulnerability. In: Management of the large-scale systems development (MLSD’2015). Proc. 8th Int. conf. (Moscow. 29 Sept. — 1 Oct. 2015). In 2 vols. Moscow: V. A. Trapeznikov Inst. of Control Sciences, RAS; 2015;2:13-24. (In Russ.).

10. Bagdasaryan V. E. Vital approach to complex social systems. In: Proc. sci. semin. “Fundamental issues of the development of complex social systems”. Moscow: Nauchnyi ekspert; 2013;(6):7-70. URL: http://rusrand.ru/files/14/08/25/140825103506_sss-2012-6.pdf (In Russ.).

11. Maturana H. R., Varela F. J. Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publ. Co. 1980. 141 p. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 42).

12. Maturana H., Varela F. El arbol del conocimiento: las bases biologicas del entendimiento humano. Transl. from Span. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya; 2001. 224 p. (In Russ).

13. Bauer V. P., Belyaev I. I., Bulavin A. V. et al. Economic security of Russia: Methodology, strategic management, system engineering. Moscow: RuScience; 2017. 350 p. (In Russ.).

14. Glaz’ev S. Yu. On urgent measures to strengthen Russia’s economic Security and lead the Russian economy to a trajectory of advanced development. A report. Moscow: Inst. for Economic Strategies, Russian Biographical Inst.; 2015. 60 p. URL: http://www.ershovm.ru/files/publications_document_194. pdf (In Russ.).

15. Gel’vanovskii M. I. Making the Russian economy more competitive under globalization: Conceptual and legal issues. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya = Modern Competition. 2007;(1):50-57. (In Russ.).