Preview

Management Sciences

Advanced search

Independence of Local Government in the Comfortable Cities of the World

https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2019-9-1-37-46

Abstract

The paper is devoted to the study of a local governments’ role in ensuring the life quality of the population in cities with a high comfort rating. The purpose of the research is a detection of similarities and differences in the organizational, legal and financial components of local governments in solving the problem of increasing the level of comfort in urban life. As an object of the research is testing a hypothesis about what aspects of an autonomy of local governments (legal, organizational acts or financial) are dominant in ensuring the life quality in cities.

The methodology of the work is based on a systematic approach, which allows to reveal problems of financial support for the activities of local governments, aimed at improving the life quality of the population. Ratings of the world cities on comfort level are considered, selection of twenty cities are having high rating of comfort according to consulting agency Mercer is defined (further — the cities of «the comfortable twenty») and their group over the countries is executed. The analysis of legal, organizational and financial autonomy of local government bodies in the cities of “the comfortable twenty” is carried out.

On analysis results the conclusion is drawn on sufficient degree legal autonomy (powers), organizational independence and financial independence of local government bodies that in combination with stability of the legislation on a local self-government allows to provide the high level of life quality of the population in the cities of “the comfortable twenty”. The conducted research is urged to fill the existing gaps between theoretical ideas of powers of local government bodies and the practical analysis of a real problem condition of increasing the effective management of cities due to strengthening of the financial independence of municipal authorities.

About the Authors

S. V. Bogachov
Public organization Institute of local and regional development
Ukraine

Sergey V. Bogachev — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Chairman of the Board of Public organization.

Donetsk


M. R. Pinskaya
Financial University; Financial Research Institute
Russian Federation

Milyausha R. Pinskaya — Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Assistant Professor, Professor of the tax policy and customs tariff regulation Department FU, Head of the Center for Tax Policy FRI.

Moscow



References

1. Gladyshev A. G., Ivanov V. N., Patrushev V. I. Municipal science: Theory, methodology, practice. Moscow: Munitsipal’nyi mir; 2003. 284 p. (In Russ.).

2. Korolev S. V. Theory of municipal administration. Moscow: VINITI RAN; 1999. 144 p. (In Russ.).

3. Zotov V. B., Aseev A. D. et al. Organization of management and self-government in major cities: Current state and problems. Moscow: State Univ. of Management, Moscow City Univ. of Management of the Government of Moscow; 2010. 296 p. (In Russ.).

4. Prudnikov A. S. Local government (management) in foreign countries. Moscow: Unity-Dana, Zakon i pravo; 2007. 271 p. (In Russ.).

5. Feshenko Yu. V. Municipal systems of foreign countries: Legal issues of social security. Moscow: MGIMO-University; 2004. 401 p. (In Russ.).

6. Uskov I. V. Foreign experience of ensuring the financial independence of municipal authorities. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal = Management of Economic Systems: Scientific Electronic Journal. 2015;(1):31. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zarubezhnyy-opyt-obespecheniya-finansovoy-samostoyatelnosti-munitsipalnyh-organov-vlasti (accessed on 01.10.2018). (In Russ.).

7. Stolyarov V. F., Ostrovetsky V. І. Methodological foundations of fiscal decentralization in Ukraine in the context of analysis of world experience in managing state revenues. Ekonomіchnii vіsnik Donbasu = Economic Herald of the Donbas. 2017;(1):52–62. (In Ukranian).

8. Hughes G., Smith S. Economic aspects of decentralized government: Structure, functions and finance. Economic Policy. 1991;6(13):425–459. DOI: 10.2307/1344632

9. Rodriguez-Pose A., Ezcurra R. Is fiscal decentralization harmful for economic growth? Evidence from the OECD countries. Journal of Economic Geography. 2011;11(4):619–643. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lbq025

10. Gracheva M. V. Budget decentralization in the OECD countries: Features of federal and unitary states. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik = Public Administration: E-Journal. 2017;(60):229–260. (In Russ.).

11. Drozdovska O. S. Theoretical foundations of financial decentralization. Fіnansi Ukraini = Finance of Ukraine. 2002;(8):19–25. (In Ukranian).


Review

For citations:


Bogachov S.V., Pinskaya M.R. Independence of Local Government in the Comfortable Cities of the World. Management Sciences. 2019;9(1):37-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2019-9-1-37-46

Views: 1163


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2304-022X (Print)
ISSN 2618-9941 (Online)