Approaches to Transforming the Corporate Culture of a Russian Enterprise as a Form of the Management System Development
https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2020-10-2-88-98
Abstract
The paper considers the problem of applying modern progressive management methods according to the criteria of efficiency and suitability, which are introduced into management system of Russian enterprises without much success. One of causes of this problem is the weak state of the corporate culture. The methodological basis of this study is the fundamental development of scientists in the scope of management methods and concepts on the paper’s subject. There is applied the methodical apparatus, that allows to evaluate of corporate culture levels in the enterprise in the initial and transformed states. The result of the work is approaches to transformations for Russian enterprises as a form of fullfledged development of the management system. The best examples and traditions of the practice of transnational and Russian companies, focused on obtaining a significant market advantage, are considered as the first step to creating an appropriate internal environment. The mechanism of corrective management actions (CMAM) is proposed, which allows for the promotion and support of transformations. The conclusion is that results of the study may be of interest to the leadership of Russian enterprises in reforming the enterprise management system.
About the Author
F. P. Zotov
Ural State Economic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Fedor P. Zotov — Cand. Sci. (Techn.), Associate Professor, the Quality Management Department
Yekaterinburg
References
1. Makarchenko M.A. Research of the organizational culture of Saint Petersburg enterprises. Vestnik SanktPeterburgskogo universiteta. Menedzhment = Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management Series. 2004;(3):53–77. (In Russ.).
2. Deal T.E., Kennedy A.A. Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. New York: Basic Books; 2000. 232 p.
3. Peters T., Waterman R. In search of excellence. Lessons from America’s best run companies. New York: HarperBusiness Publ.; 2006. 400 p. (Russ. ed.: Peters T., Waterman R. V poiskakh sovurshenstva. Uroki samykh uspeshnykh kompaniy Ameriki. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2011. 528 p.).
4. Kotter J.P., Heskett J.L. Corporate culture and performance. New York: Free Press; 1992. 224 p.
5. Shane E.H. Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publ.; 1992. 464 p. (Russ. ed.: Schein E.H. Organizatsionnaya kul’tura i liderstvo. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2002. 336 p.).
6. Liker J.K., Hoseus M. Toyota culture. The heart and soul of the Toyota way. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 2008. 562 p. (Russ. ed.: Liker J.K., Hoseus M. Korporativnaya kul’tura Toyota: uroki dlya drugikh kompanii. Moscow: Alpina Publisher; 2016. 354 p.).
7. Moran R.T., Harris Ph.R., Moran S.V. Managing cultural differences: Global leadership strategies for the 21st century. Amsterdam, Boston: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann; 2011. 570 p.
8. Ouchi W.G. Theory Z: How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. New York: Avon Books; 1993. 255 p. (Russ. ed.: Ouchi W. Metody organizatsii proizvodstva: yaponskii i amerikanskii podkhody. Moscow: EKO; 2009. 332 p.).
9. Lobova S.V., Chadina E.V., Bratarchuk T.V. Implementation of the paradigm of high productive culture at an enterprise through the creation of a favorable social environment. Quality — Access to Success. 2018;19(S 2):98–102.
10. Getele G.K., Li T., Arrive T.J. Corporate culture in small and medium enterprises: Application of corporate social responsibility theory. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2020;27(2):897– 908. DOI: 10.1002/csr.1853
11. Cezarino L.O., Rodrigues Alvez M.F. et al. Dynamic capabilities for sustainability: Revealing the systemic key factors. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 2019;32(1):93–112. DOI: 10.1007/s11213–018–9453-z
12. Vavilova A.S. Analysis of research methods of organizational culture of local authorities. Omskii nauchnyi vestnik = Omsk Scientific Bulletin. 2010;(2):79–82. (In Russ.).
13. Cameron K.S., Quinn R.E. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publ. Co.; 1998. 288 p. (Russ. ed.: Cameron K., Quinn R. Diagnostika i izmeneniye organizatsionnoy kul’tury. St. Petersburg: Piter; 2001. 320 p.).
14. Hofstede G. Typology of organizational culture. URL: http://www.corpculture.ru/content/tipologiya_korporativnykh_kultur_g_khofstede (accessed on 01.23.2020). (In Russ.).
15. Lee Y., Howe M., Kreiser P. M. Organisational culture and entrepreneurial orientation: An orthogonal perspective of individualism and collectivism. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship. 2019;37(2):125–152. DOI: 10.1177/0266242618809507
16. Gudz N.A., Monakhova N.A. History of domestic production systems. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva = Methods of Quality Management. 2017;(4):22–29. (In Russ.).
17. Rozenko N. Jidoka, or, the right process gives the right results. URL: http://www.cfin.ru/management/manufact/jidoka.shtml (accessed on 01.15.2018). (In Russ.).
18. Fomin A.V, Lapaeva О.А., Smolin A.V., Mikhno M.V. Specific features of the Japanese enterprises work culture. Ugol’ = Russian Coal Journal. 2018;(2):61–66. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18796/0041–5790–2018–2–61–66
19. Wader M. Why do you want to waste money on the implementation of Lean, if it is doomed to failure? URL: http://www.leanforum.ru/expert250/blog/message578.html (accessed on 01.21.2020). (In Russ.).
20. Zotov F.P. Formation of a model for tracking and supporting the development of an enterprise management system. In: Proc. 1st Int. Volga Region conf. on economics, humanities and sports (FICEHS 2019). Kazan: University of Management “TISBI”, Naberezhnye Chelny: Kamsk Scientific Center; 2019:452–457. (Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research. Vol. 114). DOI: 10.2991/aebmr.k.200114.107
Review
For citations:
Zotov F.P. Approaches to Transforming the Corporate Culture of a Russian Enterprise as a Form of the Management System Development. Management Sciences. 2020;10(2):88-98. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2404-022X-2020-10-2-88-98
Views:
844
Email this article 
