A Breakthrough Economy Management

The research focuses on the set of relations between business entities in regards to the management of a breakthrough economy in domestic conditions. The goal of the research is to study the management that arises from the introduction of innovations and their combinations, as well as representing the entrepreneurs vision in the production process; drawing the attention of managerial personnel to this problem — state and economic authorities, legislators, scientists and employers. There have been formulated a number of tasks: to disclose the content of breakthrough management; to present its evolution and components; to formulate economic patterns of the implementation; to justify a number of improvement areas, including the core of the main components of the algorithm and the breakthrough management financial support. The methodological basis for the development is the key provisions of strategic entrepreneurial management and the theory of classical and Austrian schools. The research methods are analysis of the development of a single and general division of managerial labor, a part and a whole in the economy; collection, processing and grouping of facts, their analysis and synthesis; the unity of the logical and historical. The conclusion is justified that the company internal management process finds its continuation outside of it, i.e. in external market development. It becomes the basic tool for the economic development of economic entities, turns into a specific rational channel for introducing combined modernization of the economy. Its uniqueness is due to the organic interaction of independent and own intracompany production, on the one hand, and the functioning of the market economy as a system, on the other one. Such implementation process becomes a driving force for an economic leap. The looking for a solution of arising problems in this case approach is a key function of breakthrough entrepreneurial management.

1. Matskuluyak I. D., Sapozhnikova N. T., Kharchilava G. P. A breakthrough economy: On the theory of economic systems change management. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2019;10(4):75–84. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2019–10–4–7

2. Matskulyak D.I., Matskulyak I.D. Change in political and economic relations and security. Moscow: The State University of Management Publ.; 2016. 335 p. (In Russ.).

3. Coase R. H. Essays on economics and economists. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2012. 236 p. (Russ. ed.: Coase R. Ocherki ob ekonomicheskoi nauke i ekonomistakh. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ.; Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya; St. Petersburg: Faculty of Liberal Arts and Sciences of St. Petersburg State University; 2015. 288 p.).

4. Gal’perin V.M. Theory of the firm. St. Petersburg: Economic School; 1995. 534 p. (In Russ.).

5. Rothbard M.N. Power & market: Government and the economy. Riverside, NJ: Andrews McMeel Publ.; 1977. 331 p. (Russ. ed.: Rothbard M. Vlast’ i rynok: gosudarstvo i ekonomika. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium; 2010. 416 p.).

6. Bylund P.L. The division of labor and the firm: An Austrian attempt at explaining the firm in the market. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2011;14(2):188–215. URL: https://cdn.mises.org/qjae14_2_3.pdf (accessed on 02.06.2020).

7. Marx K., Engels F. Capital. Vol. 1. In: Collected works. 2nd ed. Vol. 23. Transl. from German. Moscow: Gospolitizdat; 1960. 908 p. (In Russ.).

8. Walsh A., Brady M. Intra-firm coordination through rule-following and the emergence of hierarchy. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2019;22(3):357–382. DOI: 10.35297/qjae.010026

9. Sukhikh V.V. K. Marx and trust in the capitalist economy. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoi teorii = Russian Journal of the Economic Theory. 2018;15(4):659–662. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31063/2073–6517/2018.15–4.12

10. Fukuyama F. Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press; 1996. 480 p. (Russ. ed.: Fukuyama F. Doverie: sotsial’nye dobrodeteli i put’ k protsvetaniyu. Moscow: AST; Ermak; 2004. 730 p.).

11. Popov E.V., Strielkowski V., Vlasov M.V. Digitalization of intellectual activity of Russian regions. Upravlenets = The Manager. 2020;11(1):24–32. DOI: 10.29141/2218–5003–2020–11–1–3

12. Bylund P. What we know and what we don’t know about the firm. Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/library/what-we-know-and-what-we-dont-know-about-firm (accessed on 02.06.2020).

13. Vijayan J. Downsizing leave firms vulnerable to digital attacks: Disgruntled castoffs pose security threat. Computerworld. June 25, 2001. URL: https://www.computerworld.com/article/2582182/downsizings-leavefirms-vulnerable-to-digital-attacks.html (accessed on 02.06.2020).

14. Piturro M. Alternatives to downsizing. Management Review. 1999;88(9):37–42.

15. Bylund P. The division of labor is at the very core of economic growth. Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/wire/division-labor-very-core-economic-growth (accessed on 02.06.2020).

16. Bylund P. The firm and the division of labor. Mises Institute. 2011. URL: https://mises.org/library/firm-anddivision-labor (accessed on 02.06.2020).

17. Gimpelson V.E., Kapeliushnikov R.I. To live in the shadows or die in the light: Informality in the Russian labor market. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2013(11):65–88. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2013–11–65–88

18. Machaj M. The problem of production: A new theory of the firm. Book review. The Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics. 2018;21(4):427–435. URL: https://cdn.mises.org/The%20Problem%20of%20Production%20A%20New%20Theory%20of%20the%20Firm.pdf (accessed on 02.06.2020).

19. Makashov I. N., Ovchinnikova N.V. Managerial thought in Western Europe, USA and Japan (XIX–XX centuries). Moscow: Sputnik+; 2011. 744 p. (In Russ.).

20. Matskulyak I.D. The political and economic nature of market relations. Moscow: KnoRus; 2020. 442 р. (In Russ.).

21. Odegov Yu.G. et al. Recruiting as a system: Content and basic technologies of work. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal eksperimental’nogo obrazovaniya = International Journal of Experimental Education. 2016;(10–1):156. (In Russ.).

22. Smith A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.; 1904. 1152 p. (Russ. ed.: Smith A. Issledovanie o prirode i prichinakh bogatstva narodov. Moscow: Eksmo; 2007. 956 p.).

23. Mokyr J. The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2004. 384 p. (Russ. ed.: Mokyr J. Dary Afiny. Istoricheskie istoki ekonomiki znanii. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ.; 2012. 408 p.).

24. O’Hara Ph. Contemporary principles of heterodox political economy. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2009;(12):38–57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.32609/0042–8736–2009–12–38–57

25. Hausman D. M., ed. The philosophy of economics: An anthology. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007. 538 p. (Russ. ed.: Hausman D., ed. Filosofiya ekonomiki: Antologiya. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Publ.; 2012. 520 p.).

26. Mises L. von. Nationalökonomie: Theorie des Handelns und Wirtschaftens. München: Verlag Philosophia; 1980. 756 p. (Russ. ed.: Mises L. von. Chelovecheskaya deyatel’nost’: Traktat po ekonomicheskoi teorii. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium; 2008. 878 p.).

27. Ammous S. The Bitcoin standard: The decentralized alternative to central banking. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2018. 305 p. (Russ. ed.: Ammous S. Kratkaya istoriya deneg, ili vse, chto nuzhno znat’ o bitkoine. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber; 2019. 272 p.).

28. Bylund P. What most critics of “markets” get wrong about entrepreneurs. Mises Institute. 2019. URL: https://mises.org/wire/what-most-critics-markets-get-wrong-about-entrepreneurs (accessed on 02.06.2020).

29. Hayek F.A. Individualism and economic order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1996. 280 p. (Russ. ed.: Hayek F.A. Individualizm i ekonomicheskii poryadok. Chelyabinsk: Sotsium; 2011. 394 p.).