Arctic Communication System Development as a Factor of Guaranteed Access Maintenance to Strategic Resources

The development of new technologies, reducing the economic and physical costs of access to the unique resources of the Arctic, has simultaneously identified a set of interrelated economic and geopolitical problems arising during the Arctic territory development. Therefore, the subject of research of the article is the problem of the Arctic communication system formation, without which the further development of the region is not possible. The authors tried to substantiate the priority directions of the development of the communication system of the Arctic region with the aim to ensure continuous mobile access to strategically significant resources of the region in the current economic and geopolitical tendencies. The article proves that the main task of developing the Arctic should be to ensure the sustainable development of the Arctic region, which can not be achieved without the formation of an adequate level of a system of transport communications which meets the set goals and objectives of the development of the territories. Limited resources with a significant amount of required initial capital investment require an informed choice of priority investment areas, “points of growth” of the system of communications formed. The main conclusion is that the provision of operational access to the strategic resources of the Arctic is impossible without further development of the transport communications system in the region, and first of all the marine transport infrastructure (in particular, the Northern Sea route). At the same time, the impact of the redistribution of traffic flows on various aspects of the region's livelihoods, including the labor market and the social sphere, requires a separate study.

1. Ivashov L. G. The geopolitical significance of the Northern Sea Route. In: Northern Sea Route: Development of Arctic communications in the global economy “Arctic-2015”. Proc. 6th All-Russ. marine sci.-pract. conf. (Murmansk, 13– 14 May 2015). Murmansk: Murmansk State Technical Univ.; 2015:11–17. URL: https://narfu.ru/aan/Encyclopedia_Arctic/Murmansk_May_2015.pdf (In Russ.).

2. Åtland K. Interstate relations in the Arctic: An emerging security dilemma? Comparative Strategy. 2014;33(2):145– 166. DOI: 10.1080/01495933.2014.897121

3. Rowe E. W., Blakkisrud H. A new kind of Arctic Power? Russia’s policy discourses and diplomatic practices in the Circumpolar North. Geopolitics. 2014;19(1):66–85. DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2013.789863

4. Conley H. Arctic economics in the 21st century: The benefits and costs of cold. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2013. 70 p.

5. Tamnes R., Offerdal K., eds. Geopolitics and security in the Arctic: Regional dynamics in a global world. New York: Routledge Publ.; 2014. 186 p. (Routledge Global Security Studies Series).

6. Laruelle M. Russia’s Arctic strategies and the future of the Far North. New York: Routledge Publ.; 2014. 280 p.

7. Fedotovskikh A. V., Poteryakhin V. V. Creation of territories for advanced development in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. URL: http://www.arcticas.ru/docs/sa/tor_arktic_aan.pdf (accessed 10.04.2017). (In Russ.).

8. Didyk V. V. The North and the Arctic in the new paradigm of global development: Current problems. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2012;(3):37– 42. (In Russ.).

9. Naumov V. V., Nikulkina I. V., Tolstyakova V. I. Features of social and economic development of the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation in modern conditions. Vestnik economicheskoy integracii. 2012;(6):82–94. (In Russ.).

10. Peimani H., ed. Energy security and geopolitics in the Arctic: Challenges and opportunities in the 21st century. Singapore: World Scientific Publ. Co. Inc.; 2013. 320 p.

11. Kaiser B. A., Fernandez L. M., Vestergaard N. The future of the marine Arctic: Environmental and resource economic development issues. The Polar Journal. 2016;6(1):152–168. DOI: 10.1080/2154896X.2016.1171004

12. Tervo-Kankare K., Kaján E., Saarinen J. Costs and benefits of environmental change: Tourism industry’s responses in Arctic Finland. Tourism Geographies. 2018;20(2):202–223. DOI: 10.1080/14616688.2017.1375973

13. Heininen L. Arctic strategies and policies: Inventory and comparative study. Northern Research Forum, 2011. URL: https://www.rha.is/static/files/NRF/Publications/arctic_strategies_7th_draft_new_20120428.pdf

14. Bashmakova E. P., Selin V. S. Development of the economic space of the Russian Arctic on the basis of modernization of the oil and gas complex. Vestnik Kol’skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN = Herald of the Kola Science Centre RAS. 2013;(2):98–108. (In Russ.).

15. Moe A. The dynamics of Arctic development. In: Asia and the Arctic. Singapore: Springer Publ.; 2016:3–13.

16. Käpylä J., Mikkola H. The global Arctic: The growing Arctic interests of Russia, China, the United States and the European Union. FIIA Briefing Paper. 2013;(133). URL: https://storage.googleapis.com/upi-live/2017/01/bp133.pdf

17. Blunden M. Geopolitics and the Northern Sea Route. International Affairs. 2012;88(1):115–129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468–2346.2012.01060.x

18. Lalonde S., Lasserre F. The position of the United States on the Northwest Passage: Is the fear of creating a precedent warranted? Ocean Development and International Law. 2013;44(1):28–72. DOI: 10.1080/00908320.2012.726832

19. Bertelsen R. G., Gallucci V. The return of China, post-cold war Russia, and the Arctic: Changes on land and at sea. Marine Policy. 2016;72:240–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.034

20. Stephen K. Opening oil and gas development in the Arctic: A conflict and risk assessment. Tvergastein. An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Environment. 2012;(2):36–43.

21. Stephenson S. R., Smith L. C., Brigham L. W., Agnew J. A. Projected 21st-century changes to Arctic marine access. Climatic Change. 2013;118(3–4):885–899. DOI: 10.1007/s10584–012–0685–0

22. Henderson J., Loe J. The prospects and challenges for Arctic oil development. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. OIES Paper WPM. 2014;(54). URL: https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/WPM-56.pdf

23. VanderBerg J. D. Optimal Arctic port locaсtions: A quantitative composite multiplier analysis of potential sites. Polar Geography. 2018;41(1):55–74. DOI: 10.1080/1088937X.2017.1400604

24. Ng A. K.Y., Andrews J., Babb D., Lin Y., Becker A. Implications of climate change for shipping: Opening the Arctic seas. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. 2018;9(2):507. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.507

25. Nevskaya M. A., Fedoseev S. V., Marinina O. A. The analysis of the problems of mining waste products in the mineral resources sector of the Russian Federation. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 2016;11(16):9018– 9025. URL: http://wrecon.ru/system_dynamics/article/scopus/Ing_Scopus_0.260_Fedoseev_The%20analysis%20of%20the%20problems.pdf

26. Cherepovitsyn A., Tcvetkov P. Overview of the prospects for developing a renewable energy in Russia. In: 2017 Int. conf. on green energy and applications (ICGEA) (Singapore, 25–27 March 2017). New York: IEEE; 2017:113–117. DOI: 10.1109/ICGEA.2017.7925466

27. North and the Arctic in the spatial development of Russia: Scientific and analytical report. Moscow, Apatity, Syktyvkar: Kola Science Centre, RAS; 2010. 213 p. (In Russ.).

28. Koz’menko S. Yu., Selin V. S., Shchegol’kova A. A. Features of the delimitation of the Arctic sea area. Morskoi sbornik = Collected Naval Issues. 2014;2006(5):41–45. (In Russ.).

29. Selin V. S., Tsukerman V. A., Goryachevskaya E. S. Features and problems of management of the territorial economic systems of the Arctic. In: Management of the large-scale systems development (MLSD’2016). Proc. 9th Int. conf. (Moscow, 3–5 Oct. 2016). Moscow: V. A. Trapeznikov Inst. of Control Sciences, RAS; 2016:195–197. (In Russ.).

30. Bashmakova E. P., Biev A. A., Vasil’ev V.V. et al. Factor analysis and forecast of cargo flows of the Northern Sea Route. Apatity: Kola Science Centre, RAS; 2015. 335 p. (In Russ.).

31. Kennedy P. The rise and fall of the great powers. New York: Random House Publ., 1987. 677 p.

32. Selin V. S., Koz’menko S. Yu., Medvedev N. A. Coordination of economic and defense activities in the Arctic region from the viewpoint of regional presence. Vestnik Murmanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of MSTU. 2010;13(1):84–89. (In Russ.).

33. Henderson J., Ferguson A. International partnership in Russia: Conclusions from the oil and gas industry. London: Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2014. 326 p.

34. Carayannis E. G., Cherepovitsyn A. E., Ilinova A. A. Sustainable development of the Russian Arctic zone energy shelf: The role of the quintuple innovation helix model. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2017;8(2):456–470. DOI: 10.1007/s13132–017–0478–9

35. Agarkov S. A., Bogoyavlenskii V. I., Zalyvskii N. P. et al. Geoeconomic processes in the Arctic, and the development of maritime communications. Apatity: Kola Science Centre, RAS; 2014. 266 p. (In Russ.).

36. Kozlov A., Gutman S., Teslya A. Sustainable development of industrial enterprises in one-industry towns through harmonization of main stakeholders’ interests: Case of Russian Arctic Zone. In: 31st IBIMA Conf. (Milan, Italy, 25– 26 April 2018). URL: http://ibima.org/accepted-paper/sustainable-development-of-industrial-enterprises-in-oneindustry-towns-through-harmonization-of-main-stakeholders-interests-case-of-Russian-arctic-zone/

37. Koz’menko S. Yu., Afanas’ev R. A. Spatial organization of the regional economy in the development of Arctic hydrocarbon resources. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki = Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanitarian and Social Sciences. 2013;(4):97–104. (In Russ.).

38. Koz’menko S. Yu., Gainutdinova L. I. New economic geography and rationale for rational gas transport infrastructure in the region. Vestnik Murmanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of MSTU. 2012;15(1):190– 194. (In Russ.).

39. Granberg A. G. Economics and sociology of space. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii = The Economic Revival of Russia. 2010;(4):55–57. (In Russ.).

40. Matviishin D. A. Foreign and domestic experience of economic development of the Arctic territories, Arktika i Sever = Arctic and the North. 2017;(26):24–37. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17238/issn2221–2698.2017.26.24

41. Selin V. S. Problems of heterogeneity and stability of the economic space of the Russian North. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz = Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast. 2011;(5):52– 65. (In Russ.).

42. Minakir P. A., Goryunov A. P. Spatial and economic aspects of development of the Arctic. Vestnik Murmanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Vestnik of MSTU. 2015;18(3):486–492. (In Russ.).