PRACTICAL ESTIMATION OF BUSINESS PARTNERS RELIABILITY

The article is devoted to the comparative analysis and estimation of business counteragents’ reliability. To assess the reliability it’s necessary fi and above all to answer the question: what criteria must be used for counteragents’ estimation. A system of balanced expert estimations allows formalizing all the assessed counteragents’ parameters. The more characteristics are taken into consideration while analyzing the more exact result is. That’s why for all the characteristics «a provision» must be included into corporate information system and all the characteristics of the assessed counteragents must be included into information system obligatory. Before applying the method of balanced expert estimations the article suggests the criteria ranking i. e. each criterion must be taken the assessment and given the grade. It is suggested to compare the criteria while ranking and so to reach the objectiveness of the assessment relative meaning. The highest assessment is assigned to the criterion which is of the most importance for the company at the present moment. The absolute figure meanings themselves while ranking will be subjective but comparing a criterion with another one they will acquire the absolute meanings. The usage of this system allows assessing and comparing the counteragents objectively. Special attention is given to criteria classification and counteragents characteristics preceding the ranking process. Mathematical logics rules are suggested for the counteragents’ classification. The explanation of breaching the logics rules by “peculiarities” of business is absolutely unacceptable as in the similar case one can justify by «the peculiarity» for example that the square root of two is not equal to two. Mathematics is stable against any business and breaching the mathematical logics rules leads in practical life to «converting» the database into chaotically assembled elements which in its turn causes the failure to plan or for example to count the insurance stores correctly. Each classification level corresponds to definite set of properties. In order to make these properties homogeneous it’s necessary to define the grounds for division or in other words the principle of division. While creating the database these rules are breached which leads to failure to plan correctly either the final price of purchased production or relationships with counteragents. The applied calculation of real production cost with the account of the counteragents’ reliability is also offered.

classification, deviations, counteragents, reliability, logics, probability

1. Karpova S. V., Sinelnikov M. M. Innovative development directions of banks. Nauchniye trudi volnogo economicheskogo obtshestva Rossii, 2014, vol. 188, pp. 110–117 (in Russian).

2. Bowrex D. J., Kloss D. J. Logistics:the integrated net of deliveries. Moscow, 2001. 640 p. (in Russian).

3. Models and methods of logistics: study guide. Second edition, Saint-Petersburg, 2008, 448 p. (in Russian).

4. Effectiveness of logistics management: study guide. Moscow, 2004, 448 p. (in Russian).

5. Voishvillo E. K., Degtyaryov V. G. Logics: study guide. Moscow, 2001. 528 p.

6. Stepanov V. I. Logics: study guide. Moscow, 2006. 488 p. (in Russian).

7. Waters D. Logistics. Managing the net of deliveries. Moscow, 2003. 503 p. (in Russian).