Corporate Social Responsibility Effect on the Company Capitalization (the Results of an Empirical Study)

The aim of the study was to explore how Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) affects on company capitalization through the lens of a stakeholder approach. The article presents the results of the empirical study of 12 largest Russian public companies in different sectors of economy with the most developed models of CSR. The data were sampled from the database compiled by the authors for the period of 2010- 2014. The relevant hypothesis was tested using the comparative analysis, the correlation-regressive model, and methods of value based management. The findings supported the prediction that fulfilling CSR has a significant impact on company capitalization. Informational portal of Moscow Interbank Currency Stock Exchange (MICSE) was used as companies’ capitalization data base source for defining series of analytical results. CSR data were received on the base of non-financial records which were posted on the companies’ official sites. The research methodology is based on theoretical developments and scientific instrumentarium involving the comparative analysis, economic and mathematic modeling and methods of value management. The necessity of using stakeholder approach giving the possibility to look at the problem of raising business efficiency via reaching companies’ social directivity in order to satisfy all the engaged sides is justified. The article formulates a number of hypotheses which were either proved or rejected in the process of research. With the help of the correlation-regressive model it was proved that not all the social investments into human capital development as one of the main aim of CSR events directly influence on companies efficiency and their capitalization, it was also found out that not all socially responsible investments in the development of human capital directly affect company’s sustainability. This conclusion can be used as a criterion for considering socially responsible investment policy and effective decision making. The findings of the study allowed the authors to lay down the guidelines for working out rational managerial decisions to foster company’s strategic efficacy.

corporate social responsibility, stakeholder approach, sustainability reporting, company capitalization

1. Freeman R. E. Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston, Pitman Publishers, 1984, 276 p. (in English).

2. Freeman R. E. and Velamuri S. R. A New Approach to CSR: Company Stakeholder Responsibility. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1186223 (Accessed 11 May 2016) (in English).

3. Ot slov k delu. Vzaimodejstvie s zainteresovannymi storonami [From Words to Action. The stakeholder engagement manual Volume 2]: the practitioner’s handbook on stakeholder engagement. Account Ability, the United Nations Environment Programme, and Stakeholder Research Associates, 2005, 148 p. Available at: https://www.urbaneconomics.ru/download.php?dl_id=2528 (Accessed 11 May 2016) (in Russian).

4. Schwab K. The Global Competitiveness Report 2013–2014 and 2014–2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013–14.pdf (Accessed 11 May 2016) (in English); Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompe titivenessReport_2014–15.pdf (Accessed 11 May 2016) (in English).

5. Del Baldo M. Corporate Social Responibility. Human resource management and corporate family Responibility. When a company is the best place to work?: Elica group, the hi-life company. Ekonomska i strazivanja — Economic research, 2013, special issue (in English).

6. Matthiesen M.-L. and Salzmann A. J. Corporate Social Responsibility and Firms’ Cost of Capital: Does Culture Matter? Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2600542 (Accessed 11 May 2016) (in English).

7. Aluchna M. Corporate social responsibility of the Top 10: Examples taken from the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Social Responsibility Journal, 2010, no. 6 (4), рр. 611–626 (in English).

8. Aguinis H. and Glavas A. What we know and don’t know about Corporate Social Responsibility: a review and research agenda. Journal of Management, vol. 38, no. 4, рр. 932–968 (in English).

9. Bataeva B. S., Kozhevina O. V. Mekhanizm ocenki kachestva upravleniya nepublichnymi rossijskimi kompaniyami v interesah gosudarstva i stejkholderov: postanovka problemy i metodicheskie aspekty [The evaluation mechanism of quality management of the non-public Russian companies in the interests of the state and stakeholders: problem statement and methodological aspects]. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya — Fundamental research, 2015, vol. 10, no. 3, рр 554–558.

10. Blagov Yu.E.Korporativnaya sotsial’naya otvetstvenost’: evolyutsiya kontseptsii [Corporate social responsibility: evolution of the concept]. St. Petersburg, High school of management, 2011, 272 p. (in Russian).

11. Belyaeva Z. Transformation processes of the corporate development in Russia: social responsibility issues // Systems Practice and Action Research, 2013, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 485–496 (in English).

12. Ankudinov A. B., Yarovinskaya M. S. Politika korporativnoy sotsial’noy otvetstvenosti v kontexte strategicheskogo upravleniya rosiyskimi kompaniyami [The policy of corporate social responsibility in the context of the strategic management of Russian companies]. Sotsial’naya otvetstvenost’ biznesa: teoriya, metodologiya, praktika: materiali Vserosiyskoy naucno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Corporate social responsibility: theory, methodology, practice: Proceedings of the scientific-practical conference]. Ufa, 2010, pp. 15–17 (in Russian).

13. Ankudinov A. B., Borisov D. M. Korporativnaya sotsial’naya otvetstvenost’ kak faktor dolgosrochnogo rosta [Corporate Social Responsibility as a Factor for Long-Term Growth]. Izvestiya UGEU — Bulletin of USEU, 2013, no. 1 (45), pp. 109–114 (in Russian).

14. Glebova I., Rodnyansky D., Sadyrtdinov R., Khabibrakhmanova R. and YasnitskayaYa.Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility of Russian Companies Based on Nonfinancial Reporting Middle-East. Journal of Scientific Research 13 (Socio-Economic Sciences and Humanities), 2013, no. 13, рр. 143–148 (in English).

15. Tkachenko I. N. Noviye tendentsii v razvitii rosiyskoy modeli korporativnogo upravleniya: postkrizisniye uroki i vivodi [New trends in development the Russian model of corporate governance: post-crisis lessons and conclusions]. Ekaterinburg, USUE, part 1, 2011, 298 p. (in Russian).

16. Tkachenko I. N. Vliyanie globalizacii na razvitie stejkholderskoj modeli korporativnogo upravleniya [The Impact of Globalization on the Development of the Stakeholder Model of Corporate Governance]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo ehkonomicheskogo universiteta — Izvestia of USUE, 2013, no. 1 (45), pp. 19–27 (in Russian).

17. Tkachenko I. N., Evseeva M. V.Stejkholderskaya model' korporativnogo upravleniya v proektah gosudarstvennochastnogo partnerstva [The stakeholder model of corporate governance in the public-private partnership projects]. Upravlencheskiye nauki— Management sciences, 2014, no. 1 (10), pp. 26–33 (in Russian).

18. Nacional’nyj Registr i Biblioteka korporativnyh nefinansovyh otchetov [National Register of nonfinancial reports]. Available at: http://rspp.ru/simplepage/157 (Accessed 11 May 2016) (in Russian).