Diagnosis of Bankruptcy as a Phased Process

Corporate bankruptcy can be understood as a phase-based managerial process in which weak signals, together with the informational noise that obscures them, shape the trajectory of organizational degradation long before the actual collapse occurs. This conclusion emerges from shifting the focus of bankruptcy diagnostics away from traditional accounting and financial reporting toward institutional sensitivity. The concept of the phase dynamics of bankruptcy is synthesized from the phenomenology of the discrepancy between declared and actual practices, the assessment of feedback intensity, and the tonal analysis of a company’s public communications. The aim of this study is to develop a phase model for the early diagnosis of bankruptcy and to determine the threshold of loss of reflexivity, which marks a point of no return for the managerial system. The empirical part of the study includes the reconstruction of pre-crisis bankruptcy profiles of Enron, Long-Term Capital Management, and Barings Bank. Based on qualitative and quantitative analysis of behavioral patterns and public communications using the authors’ original indicators, it was established that a stable simultaneous exceedance of their threshold values is accompanied by the contraction of the “window of opportunity” for decisionmakers and by an acceleration of escalation dynamics. The findings allow a shift in emphasis from reactive to proactive management, thereby reducing the likelihood of an avalanche-like transition to the irreversible phase of crisis.

1. Plato. The republic. Books VIII-IX. Transl. from ancient Greek. London: Arcturus; 2017. 304 p.

2. Taleb N. N. Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. New York, NY: Random House; 2012. 544 p.

3. Weick K. E. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1995. 231 p. (Foundations for organizational science. Vol. 3).

4. Silver N. The signal and the noise: Why so many predictions fail — but some don’t. New York, NY: Penguin Books; 2012. 544 p.

5. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011. 496 p. DOI: 10.1007/s00362-013-0533-y

6. De Geus A. The living company: Growth, learning and longevity in business. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing; 1999. 224 p.

7. Zhukov A. O., Kamolov S. G., Khrustalev E. Yu. Models and methods for stimulating innovative development of the knowledge- intensive sector of the Russian economy. Moscow: MGIMO University; 2018. 228 p. (In Russ.).

8. Ansoff H. I. Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals. California Management Review. 1975;18(2):21-33. DOI: 10.2307/41164635

9. Clarke T., Branson D., eds. The SAGE handbook of corporate governance. London: SAGE Publications; 2012. 680 p.

10. Neumann J., von. Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1944. 625 p.

11. Graebner M. E., Martin J. A., Roundy P. T. Qualitative data: Cooking without a recipe. Strategic Organization. 2012;10(3):276-284. DOI: 10.1177/1476127012452821

12. Zhao S., Xu K., Wang Z., et al. Financial distress prediction by combining sentiment tone features. Economic Modelling. 2022;106:105709. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105709

13. Wei L., Jing H., Huang J., et al. Do textual risk disclosures reveal corporate risk? Evidence from U.S. fintech corporations. Economic Modelling. 2023;127:106461. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106461

14. Reichmann D. Tone management and stock price crash risk. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy; 2023;42(6):107155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107155

15. Wei L., Wei M., Jing H., Jing Z. Annual report tone and bank risk-taking behavior: Evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance. 2025;77A:102881. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102881

16. Argyris C., Schön D. A. Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison- Wesley; 1996. 305.

17. Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1978. 300 p.

18. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453-458. DOI: 10.1126/science.7455683

19. Levinas E. Autrement qu’être ou au-delà de l’essence. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff; 1974. 233 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-1111-7

20. Buchholz F., Lopatta K., Maas K. The deliberate engagement of narcissistic CEOs in earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics. 2020;167(1):663-686. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-019-04176-x

21. Hutton A. P., Marcus A. J., Tehranian H. Opaque financial reports, R², and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics. 2009;94(1):67-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.003

22. Perrow C. Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1984. 386 p.

23. Shannon C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal. 1948;27(3-4):379 423;623-656. DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x

24. Akerlof G. A., Romer P. M. Looting: The economic underworld of bankruptcy for profit. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1993;24(2):1-74. DOI: 10.2307/2534564

25. Baudrillard J. Simulacra and simulation. Transl. from French. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1994. 164 p.

26. Greenspan A. Testimony of Chairman Alan Greenspan before the Committee on Banking and Financial Services, U. S. House of Representatives: Private- sector refinancing of the large hedge fund, long-term capital management. The Federal Reserve Board. October 01, 1998. URL: https://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/testimony/1998/19981001.htm