Key Performance (Benefit) Indicators of Innovative and Investment Activity in Aviation Systems’ Establishment
https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2017-7-2-56-65
Abstract
The article is devoted to the elements of solving the problems of innovation and investment projecting and assessing the investment projects effectiveness (benefit) in creating high technology products - AS in the aviation industry. In this article the attempt has been done to consider some aspects of the analysis and methods of forming the key performance (benefit) indicators of innovative and investment activity of AS creation and development, which can also help in solving urgent economic problem of elaborating innovation and investment planning methodology (IIPM) in aviation production, which is particularly important for economic, social, scientific and defense value. The various kinds of interactions in the process of fulfillment the programs issues and development plans of AS and other systems are highlighted and offered, such as competitiveness, performing proactive development and financing at the expense of their own resources, evaluation of the integrated utility, control, etc. Some kind of IIPM common performance (benefit) indicators system is proposed which is differentiated according to the type of labor relations, the innovative and investment process stage, the type of control and territorial entities, evaluating the innovation-AS. In addition to methodological approaches, methodical tools of integrated management system (IMS) aircraft company (AC), complex decision-making support “comrade” and IIPM performance (benefit) evaluation - G, S, T (Greybeard, Suvorov, Tochilin) are suggested. The preparation of their program elaboration and practical testing under the conditions of uncertainty and risks have been carried out, which basic method is a complex combined method of decision making preparation and other decisions, which also can help expertise and key performance (benefit) indicators assessment while creating AS.
About the Author
O. V. Tochilin
Moscow State Technical University of Civil Aviation;
Moscow Aviation Institute
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
PhD (Economics), doctoral student;
leading engineer
References
1. Tochilin O.V. Nekotorye osobennosti setevyh organizacij v aviastroitel’nom proizvodstve [Some features of network organizations in aircraft production]. Vestnik akademii voennyh nauk — Bulletin of the Military Sciences Academy, 2017, no. 1, pp. 331–351 (in Russian).
2. Tochilin O.V. Formirovanie metodologii organizacii innovacionno-investicionnogo proektirovaniya v aviastroitel’nom proizvodstve: monografiya [The methodology formation of organizing innovation and investment design in aircraft production: monograph]. Moscow, Izd-vo REHU im. G.V. Plekhanova — G.V. Plekhanov REU Publishing House, 2017, 376 p. (in Russian).
3. Bolov V.R. et al. Metodologicheskie voprosy resheniya zadachi opredeleniya integral’nogo pokazatelya prirodno-tekhnogennoj opasnosti territorii [Methodological issues of solving the problem of defining natural and technogenic danger territory cumulative indicator]. Problemy prognozirovaniya chrezvychajnyh situacij: materialy IХ nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii [Problems of forecasting emergencies: Proc. IX Sci. Conf.]. Moscow, Centr «Antistihiya» MCHS Rossii — “Antistihija” Centre, EMERCOM of Russia, 2009, pp. 286–306 (in Russian).
4. Penkova T. V. Korobko A. V. Postroenie integrirovannoj OLAP-modeli na osnove formal’nogo konceptual’nogo analiza [Building integrated OLAP model based on formal concept analysis]. Informatizaciya i svyaz’ — Informatization and Communication, 2011, no. 3, 2011, pp. 23–25 (in Russian).
5. Suhov A.O. Teoreticheskie osnovy razrabotki DSL-instrumentariya s ispol’zovaniem grafovyh grammatik [Theoretical fundamentals of DSL tools using Graph grammars]. Informatizaciya i svyaz’ — Informatization and Communication, 2011, no. 3, pp. 35–37 (in Russian).
6. Lyadova L.N. Sozdanie sistem podderzhki risk-orientirovannogo upravleniya na osnove metamodelirovaniya i yazykovyh instrumentariev [Creating support systems for risk-oriented management on the basis of metamodeling and linguistic toolkits]. Informatizaciya i svyaz’ — Informatization and Communication, 2011, no. 3, 110 p. (in Russian).
7. Larman C. Primenenie UML i shablonov proektirovaniya. Vvedenie v ob”ektno-orientirovannyi analiz i proektirovanie: ucheb. posobie; per. s angl. [Application of UML and design patterns. Introduction to objectoriented analysis and projecting: a study-book, transl. from English]. Moscow, Izdatel’skij dom «Vil’yams» — “Williams” Publishing House, 2001, 496 p. (in Russian).
8. Bin D. XML dlya proektirovshchikov. Povtornoe ispol’zovanie i integraciya [XML for designers. Reuse and integration]. Moscow, KUDIC-OBRAZ — KUDITS-IMAGE, 2004, 256 p. (in Russian).
9. Khoroshilov A.A. Avtomaticheskij analiz tekstov na osnove ispol’zovaniya tekhnologij «Big Data»: Nacional’nyj superkomp’yuternyj forum, 24–27 noyabrya 2015 g. [Automated analysis of texts based on the use of “Big Data” technology: National Supercomputer Forum, 24–27 November, 2015]. URL: https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=54VpvUh3iYY (accessed: 27.01.2017) (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Tochilin O.V. Key Performance (Benefit) Indicators of Innovative and Investment Activity in Aviation Systems’ Establishment. Management Sciences. 2017;7(2):56-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2017-7-2-56-65
Views:
634
Email this article 
