Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration: Partnership or Symbiosis?
https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2025-15-3-90-97
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the transformation of the public and municipal administration (PMA) system. The article explores key areas of AI integration into the public sector, along with realworld examples of AI applications in government agencies in both Russia and abroad. It introduces a classifier of AI solutions for PMA, including potential pilot platforms and international counterparts. The article emphasizes that AI functions not merely as a tool but as a full-fledged partner capable of fundamentally reshaping governance approaches. The study concludes that institutional and technological readiness is essential for the large-scale implementation of AI in public administration. The research employs methods of international case analysis and comparative evaluation of AI implementation practices. The findings may be valuable to public administration professionals, digital solution developers, and government bodies planning to introduce AI technologies.
About the Author
M. M. Artyukhina
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria M. Artyukhina — Assistant Professor, Department of Public and Municipal Administration,
Faculty of Higher School of Management
Moscow
References
1. Vuković D.B., Dekpo-Adza S., Matović S. AI integration in financial services: A systematic review of trends and regulatory challenges. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2025;12:562. DOI: 10.1057/s41599–025–04850–8
2. Legashov M.A., Golovtsova I.G. Fundamentals and prospects for the use of artificial intelligence methods in public administration. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2023;(6–2):26–32. (In Russ.).
3. BrycheevA.S.Application of artificial intelligence in government bodies: Challenges and prospects. Vestnik evraziiskoi nauki = The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2024;16(S 6):6–15. URL: https://esj.today/PDF/11FAVN 624.pdf (In Russ.).
4. Izilyaeva L.O., Vasiliev Ya.K., Mirokiyants K.S., Yasavieva A.I. The possibilities and risks of using artificial intelligence in the field of political relations of the Russian Federation. Ekonomika i upravlenie: nauchnoprakticheskii zhurnal = Economics and Management: Research and Practice Journal. 2024;(1):136–139. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34773/EU.2024.1.24
5. Wirtz B.W., Müller W.M. An integrated artificial intelligence framework for public management. Public Management Review. 2019;21(7):1076–1100. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1549268
6. Zub A.T., Petrova K.S. Artificial intelligence in corporate governance: Opportunities and limits of application. Public Administration. E-Journal. 2022;(94):173–184.
7. Nurmukhametov R.N. Artificial intelligence in crime prevention and control: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2024;12(1):185–189. (In Russ.).
8. Loginov E.L., Erishvili N.D., Bortalevich V. Yu., Loginova V.E. Cognitive programming of behavior trajectories of employees of state agencies to support the work of state institutions of management in complex rapidly changing conditions. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii = Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2017;(5):250–256. (In Russ.).
9. Sun T.Q., Medaglia R. Mapping the challenges of artificial intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly. 2019;36(2):368–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
10. Burnham K. The ‘productivity paradox’ of AI adoption in manufacturing firms. MIT Sloan school of management. July 1, 2025. URL: https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/productivity-paradox-aiadoption-manufacturing-firms
11. Ushev I. The connection between the state and business in the development of artificial intelligence. Security and Safety. 2025. URL: https://www.secuteck.ru/articles/svyaz-gosudarstva-i-biznesa-v-razvitiiiskusstvennogo-intellekta (accessed on 18.06.2025). (In Russ.).
12. Mergel I., Edelmann N., Haug N. Defining digital transformation: Results from expert interviews. Government Information Quarterly. 2019;36(4):101385. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.002
13. Kankanhalli A., Charalabidis Y., Mellouli S. IoT and AI for smart government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly. 2019;36(2):304–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.003
14. Dilmegani, C. AI in Government: Examples & Challenges in 2025. AI Multiple Research. 2025:1–7.
15. Katanandov S.L., Kovalev A.A. Technological development of modern states: Artificial intelligence in public administration. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski = State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2023(1):174–182. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/2079–1690–2023–1–1–174–182
Review
For citations:
Artyukhina M.M. Artificial Intelligence in Public Administration: Partnership or Symbiosis? Management Sciences. 2025;15(3):90-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2025-15-3-90-97
Views:
1
Email this article 
