Russian Public Administration: Directions for Adaptation to Crisis Conditions
https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2026-16-2-27-38
Abstract
The relevance of this study stems from the need to improve the effectiveness of responses to large-scale crisis phenomena under which the Russian economy has operated over the past six years. The purpose of the study is to identify and characterize the key directions for adapting the Russian public administration system to contemporary complex conditions. The subject of the research is a comprehensive analysis of the Russian economy, ranging from mapping methodologies to the digitalization of public administration. The study concludes that the effectiveness of Russian public administration under crisis conditions may be enhanced through the implementation of a hybrid governance model in which centralized management within a mobilization economy framework is complemented by a buffer of flexible public policy instruments. Such a combination may reduce the response time of the public administration system to crisis situations both through rapid centralized decision-making and through flexible and timely responses to evolving crisis dynamics. The findings of the study may be useful for representatives of public authorities, crisis management specialists, and analysts involved in the development of public administration systems.
Keywords
About the Authors
V. V. EreminRussian Federation
Vladimir V. Eremin – Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Leading Researcher, Institute of Economic Policy and Economic Security
Moscow
S. N. Silvestrov
Russian Federation
Sergey N. Silvestrov – Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Prof., Honoured Economist of the Russian Federation, Head of the Institute of Economic Policy and Economic Security Problems
Moscow
References
1. Shirov A. A. Russian economy: Changes in the growth factors. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2025;36(6):765-773. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700725700492 (In Russ.: Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2025;(6):8-20. DOI:10.47711/0868-6351-213-8-20).
2. Kuvalin D. B., Zinchenko Yu.V., Ibragimov Sh.Sh., Zaytseva A. A. Russian enterprises in Spring 2025: Decline in investment activity due to the high cost of credit. Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2025;36(6):889-902. DOI: 10.1134/S1075700725700625 (In Russ. Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2025;(6):173-190. DOI: 10.47711/0868-6351-213-173-190).
3. Mikheeva N. N. Resilience of the economy of the Russian regions to external shocks: evaluation on the basis of operational data. Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnokhozyaistvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN = Scientific Articles: Institute of Economic Forecasting. Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023;21(1):151-174. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.47711/2076-3182-2023-1-151-174
4. Zemtsov S. P., Voloshinskaya A. A. Russian regional resilience under sanctions. Zhurnal Novoi ekonomicheskoi assotsiatsii = Journal of the New Economic Association. 2024;(3):54-83. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2024_3_54-83
5. Shaposhnikov A. V. Transforming public administration during the crisis: The experience of Moscow. Upravlenie i politika =Governance and Politics. 2022;1(3):7-26. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.24833/2782-7062-2022-1-3-7-26
6. Kupryashin G. L. Public administration crises: Institutional approach. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyi vestnik = Public Administration. E-Journal. 2015;(51):56-84. (In Russ.).
7. Okhotskii E. V. Public administration in a crisis situation. Vestnik gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya = Journal of Public and Municipal Administration. 2014;(2-1):8-22. (In Russ.).
8. Mamyrbaeva Z., Ketners K., Zheenalieva A., Sheripov N., Hudyma O. Public administration effectiveness in crises and emergencies: Experiences and lessons from different countries. Fascicolo. 2025;(2):146-169. DOI: 10.13130/2723-9195/2025-2-5
9. Shubtsova L. V. State anti-crisis management: System approach. Natsional’nye interesy: prioritety i bezopasnost’ = National Interests: Priorities and Security. 2011;7(5):11-18. (In Russ.).
10. Leksin V.N. The effectiveness and efficiency of regional and municipal government actions: purpose and possibilities of correct assessment. Regional Research of Russia. (In Russ.: Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya. 2012;(1):3-39.).
11. Mamisheva Z. A. Evaluation of the effectiveness of public administration of the national economy in the context of the geopolitical crisis: Theoretical and legal foundations. Gumanitarnye, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, Social-Economic and Social Sciences. 2022;(11-2):123-127. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.23672/h8280-7910-5884-b
12. Nelson M. H. Mandate for leadership: The conservative promise. Washington DC: The Heritage Foundation; 2023. 920 p.
13. Karp A. C., Zamiska N. W. The technological republic: Hard power, soft belief, and the future of the West. New York, NY: Crown Currency; 2025. 320 p.
14. Pastukhov A. L. The recycling and industrial symbioses as organizational technological factors of economic development and national security. Tekhniko-tekhnologicheskie problemy servisa. 2021;(3):63-68. (In Russ.).
15. Dubrovskaya Yu.V., Kozonogova E. V., Kurushin D. S. Computer visualization for the algorithmization and programming task of territorial division based on interactive mapping. Scientific Visualization. 2023;15(1):29-46. DOI: 10.26583/ sv.15.1.03
16. Popov E. V., Chelak I. P., Skvortsov M. M. Mapping of segments of the economic ecosystem of the territory. Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal’noe upravlenie. Uchenye zapiski = State and Municipal Management. Scholar Notes. 2024;(3):101-110. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.22394/2079-1690-2024-1-3-101-110
17. Romanova N. N., Gryzunov V. V. Research by the method of an extended systematical literature review E-SLR the problem of ensuring the security of personal data when using OSINT. Vestnik Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Tekhnicheskie nauki = Herald of Daghestan State Technical University. Technical Sciences. 2024;51(3):130-144. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21822/2073-6185-2024-51-3-130-144
18. Roy M. B., Roy A. The use of generative AI in government-to government (G2G) governance: A strategic approach to enhanced public administration. Advances in Consumer Research. 2025;2(4):3183-3189.
19. Bronnikov I. A., Zakalskiy G. V. Digital twin in the political process of modern Russia. PolitBook. 2021;(3):167-179. (In Russ.).
20. Yuzhakov V. N., Pokida A. N., Zybunovskaya N. V., Starostina A. N. Digitalization the interaction between citizens and state: Citizens’ assessment of effects, risks and prospects. Voprosy gosudarstvennogo i munitsipal’nogo upravleniya = Public Administration Issues. 2023;(2):33-73. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2023-0-2-33-73
Review
For citations:
Eremin V.V., Silvestrov S.N. Russian Public Administration: Directions for Adaptation to Crisis Conditions. Management Sciences. 2026;16(2):27-38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2304-022X-2026-16-2-27-38
JATS XML


























